skip to main content

Effect of Si/Al Ratio on Competitive CO₂/H2O Adsorption in FAU Zeolite for Humid Flue Gas Capture: A Computational Study

Directorate General of Maysan Education, Ministry of Education, Iraq

Received: 29 Jul 2026; Revised: 10 Aug 2026; Accepted: 12 Aug 2026; Available online: 16 Aug 2026; Published: 26 Dec 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

Carbon capture from humid flue gas is problematic. Many microporous adsorbents are poisoned by water vapor. This research aims to study the effect of the Si/Al ratio on the competitive adsorption of CO₂ and H₂O in FAU-type zeolites, as well as evaluate their performance in capturing humid flue gases. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations were performed to study the competitive adsorption of equimolar CO₂/H₂O mixtures at 298 K in two FAU zeolites: Zeolite 13X (Na₇₇, Si/Al ≈ 1.5) and Zeolite Y (Na₄₉, Si/Al≈2.92). The results showed that Zeolite 13X shows higher adsorption of CO₂ under low pressures, with the phenomenon of the roll-over occurring in the case of high pressure because of competitive adsorption with H₂O. In turn, the adsorption of CO₂ for Zeolite Y remained stable over the entire pressure range and exhibited lower H₂O uptake. Isosteric heats of CO₂ adsorption on the zeolites are 15.71 kcal/mol for Zeolite 13X and 13.23 kcal/mol for Zeolite Y. The energy of CO₂ binding in the presence of H₂O decreased by 1.14 kcal/mol for Zeolite 13X and for 2.03 kcal/mol for Zeolite Y. These findings indicate that high-silica FAU zeolites, such as Zeolite Y, are efficient CO₂ adsorbents. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Keywords: CO₂ adsorption; Zeolite 13X; Zeolite Y; FAU zeolite; GCMC simulation; carbon capture; competitive adsorption; humidity; water poisoning; isosteric heat

Article Metrics:

  1. D'Alessandro, D.M., Smit, B., Long, J.R. (2010). Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 49(35), 6058‑6082. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201000431
  2. Sircar, S. (2006). Basic Research Needs for Design of Adsorptive Gas Separation Processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(16), 5435‑5448. DOI: 10.1021/ie051056a
  3. Xu, H., Wu, P. (2022). New Progress in Zeolite Synthesis and Catalysis. National Science Review, 9(9), nwac045. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac045
  4. Chen, C., Park, D.W., Ahn, W.S. (2014). CO₂ Capture Using Zeolite 13X Prepared from Bentonite. Applied Surface Science, 292, 63‑67. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.087
  5. Balzer, C., Shen, V.K., Sholl, D.S. (2023). Computing mixture adsorption in porous materials through flat histogram Monte Carlo methods. Langmuir, 39(43), 15380–15390. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02466
  6. Pérez‑Botella, E., Valencia, S., Rey, F. (2022). Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chemical Reviews, 122(24), 17647‑17695. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140
  7. Siriwardane, R.V., Shen, M.S., Fisher, E.P., Poston, J.A. (2001). Adsorption of CO₂ on Molecular Sieves and Zeolites. Energy & Fuels, 15(2), 279‑284. DOI: 10.1021/ef000241s
  8. Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E. (2004). Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 49(4), 1095‑1101. DOI: 10.1021/je0498917
  9. Lemecho, B.A., Espín, J., Rodlamul, P., Kiefer, F., Queen, W.L., Subramanian, V. (2026). A sustainable multi‑zeolite synthetic framework from a single natural clay: CO₂/H₂O adsorption performance and life cycle assessment benefits. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 10, 1038‑1058. DOI: 10.1039/d5se01375e
  10. Harlick, P.J.E., Tezel, F.H. (2004). An experimental adsorbent screening study for CO₂ removal from gas mixtures. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 76(1‑3), 71‑79. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.07.033
  11. Walton, K.S., Abney, M.B., LeVan, M.D. (2006). CO₂ adsorption in Y and X zeolites modified by alkali metal cation exchange. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 91(1‑3), 78‑84. DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.11.023
  12. Joos, L., Swisher, J. A., Smit, B. (2013). Molecular simulation study of the competitive adsorption of H₂O and CO₂ in zeolite 13X. Langmuir, 29(51), 15936–15942. DOI: 10.1021/la403824g
  13. Lee, J.S., Kim, J.H., Kim, J.T., Suh, J.K., Lee, J.M., Lee, C.H. (2002). Adsorption Equilibria of CO₂ on Zeolite 13X and Zeolite X/Activated Carbon Composite. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 47(5), 1237‑1242. DOI: 10.1021/je020050e
  14. Kim, J., Lin, L.C., Martin, R.L., Swisher, J.A., Haranczyk, M., Smit, B. (2016). Understanding the Mechanisms of CO₂ Adsorption Enhancement in Pure Silica Zeolites under Humid Conditions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 120(35), 19728‑19736. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06571
  15. Wu, X., Zhang, Y. (2024). Molecular simulation of water effect on CO₂ adsorption in metal‑organic frameworks and zeolites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 480, 148150. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148150
  16. Zhao, J., Deng, S., Zhao, L., Yuan, X., Du, Z., Li, S., Chen, L., Wu, K. (2020). Understanding the effect of H₂O on CO₂ adsorption capture: Mechanism explanation, quantitative approach and application. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 4, 4828–4841. DOI: 10.1039/D0SE01179G
  17. Li, J., Gao, M., Yan, W., Yu, J. (2023). Regulation of the Si/Al ratios and Al distributions of zeolites and their impact on properties. Chemical Science, 14(8), 1935–1959. DOI: 10.1039/D2SC06010H
  18. Atalay‑Oral, C., Tatlier, M. (2024). Tailoring Hydrophobicity vs. Water Capacity of Adsorbents for Adsorption Applications. Adsorption, 30(6), 673‑684. DOI: 10.1007/s10450‑024‑00459‑6
  19. Hyla, A.S., Fang, H., Boulfelfel, S.E., Muraro, G.M., Paur, C.S., Strohmaier, K.G., Ravikovitch, P.I., Sholl, D.S. (2019). Significant temperature dependence of the isosteric heats of adsorption of gases in zeolites demonstrated by experiments and molecular simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 123(33), 20405–20412. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05758
  20. Golipour, H., Mokhtarani, B., Mafi, M., Khadivi, M.A., Godini, H.R. (2019). Systematic measurements of CH₄ and CO₂ adsorption isotherms on cation-exchanged zeolites 13X. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 64(10), 4412–4423. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.9b00473
  21. Shao, W., Zhang, L., Li, L., Lee, R.L. (2009). Adsorption of CO₂ and N₂ on synthesized NaY zeolite at high temperatures. Adsorption, 15(5), 497‑505. DOI: 10.1007/s10450‑009‑9200‑y
  22. Ahn, H., Moon, J.H., Hyun, S.H., Shul, Y.G. (2004). Diffusion mechanism of carbon dioxide in zeolite 4A and CaX pellets. Adsorption, 10(2), 111‑128. DOI: 10.1023/B:ADSO.0000039867.14756.ac
  23. Awala, H., Gilson, J.-P., Retoux, R., Boullay, P., Goupil, J.-M., Valtchev, V., Mintova, S. (2015). Template-free nanosized faujasite-type zeolites. Nature Materials, 14(4), 447–451. DOI: 10.1038/nmat4173
  24. Calero, S., Dubbeldam, D., Krishna, R., Smit, B., Vlugt, T.J.H., Denayer, J.F.M., Martens, J.A., Maesen, T.L.M. (2004). Understanding the role of sodium during adsorption: A force field for alkanes in sodium-exchanged faujasites. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 126(36), 11377–11386. DOI: 10.1021/ja0476056
  25. Sun, H. (1998). COMPASS: An ab Initio Force‑Field Optimized for Condensed‑Phase Applications. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 102(38), 7338‑7364. DOI: 10.1021/jp980939v
  26. Potoff, I.R., Siepmann, J.I. (2001). Vapor–liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. AIChE Journal, 47(7), 1676‑1682. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690470719
  27. Frenkel, D., Smit, B. (2001). Understanding molecular simulation: From algorithms to applications (2nd ed.). Academic Press
  28. Jiang, J., Sandler, S.I. (2003). Monte Carlo simulation for the adsorption and separation of linear and branched alkanes in zeolite ITQ‑1. Langmuir, 19(13), 5403‑5412. DOI: 10.1021/la030062i
  29. Vuong, T., Monson, P.R. (1996). Monte Carlo Simulations of the Adsorption of Ethane, Propane, and Their Mixtures in Silicalite. Langmuir, 12(22), 5425‑5432. DOI: 10.1021/la960416q
  30. Llewellyn, P.L., Maurin, G. (2005). Gas adsorption in open‑framework nanomaterials: predicting and understanding the process. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 8(3‑4), 283‑302. DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2005.01.006
  31. Hefti, M., Joss, L., Bjelobrk, N., Mazzotti, M. (2015). A simple and robust method to determine isosteric heats of adsorption. Adsorption, 21, 563–573. DOI: 10.1007/s10450-015-9710-z
  32. Cimino, R.T., Kowalczyk, P., Ravikovitch, P.I., Neimark, A.V. (2017). Determination of isosteric heat of adsorption by quenched solid density functional theory. Langmuir, 33(8), 1769–1779. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04119

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.