skip to main content

Effect of Temperature and Pressure Variation on CO₂ Methanation Performance in a PFR Reactor Using Ni/Al₂O₃ Catalyst

1Department of Checimal Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia

2Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 18 Apr 2026; Revised: 28 Apr 2026; Accepted: 29 Apr 2026; Available online: 5 May 2026; Published: 26 Dec 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

This study investigates the effect of feed temperature and pressure on the performance of CO₂ methanation using simulation results from Aspen HYSYS. The analysis focuses on the variation of CO and CH₄ mole fractions in the product stream under temperature ranges of 350–500°C and pressure ranges of 100–300 kPa. The results show that temperature has a minimal effect on both CO and CH₄ compositions, with only slight fluctuations observed, indicating that the system operates equilibrium conditions. In contrast, pressure exhibits a more noticeable influence, where increasing pressure leads to a gradual decrease in CO mole fraction and a corresponding increase in CH₄ mole fraction. These findings are consistent with the exothermic nature of the methanation reaction and Le Chatelier’s principle, confirming that higher pressure favors methane formation. Overall, the study highlights that pressure is a more significant operating parameter than temperature in enhancing CO₂ conversion to CH₄ under the investigated conditions.

Keywords: CO₂ methanation; temperature effect; pressure effect; methane production; process optimization

Article Metrics:

  1. Tripodi, A., Conte, F., & Rossetti, I. (2020). Carbon dioxide methanation: design of a fully integrated plant. Energy & fuels, 34(6), 7242-7256
  2. Rönsch, S., Schneider, J., Matthischke, S., Schlüter, M., Götz, M., Lefebvre, J. & Bajohr, S. (2016). Review on methanation–From fundamentals to current projects. Fuel, 166, 276-296
  3. Ren, J., Lou, H., Xu, N., Zeng, F., Pei, G., & Wang, Z. (2023). Methanation of CO/CO2 for power to methane process: Fundamentals, status, and perspectives. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 80, 182-206
  4. Tommasi, M., Degerli, S. N., Ramis, G., & Rossetti, I. (2024). Advancements in CO2 methanation: A comprehensive review of catalysis, reactor design and process optimization. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 201, 457-482
  5. Gao, J., Liu, Q., Gu, F., Liu, B., Zhong, Z., & Su, F. (2015). Recent advances in methanation catalysts for the production of synthetic natural gas. Rsc Advances, 5(29), 22759-22776
  6. Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2018). Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Catalysis Today, 316, 2–18
  7. Du Preez, S. P., Jones, D. R., Warwick, M. E., Falch, A., Sekoai, P. T., das Neves Quaresma, C. M., Bessarabov, D.G., & Dunnill, C. W. (2020). Thermally stable Pt/Ti mesh catalyst for catalytic hydrogen combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(33), 16851-16864
  8. Duan, H., Jia, M., Chang, Y., & Liu, H. (2019). Experimental study on the influence of low-temperature combustion (LTC) mode and fuel properties on cyclic variations in a compression-ignition engine. Fuel, 256, 115907
  9. García Huante, A., Rodríguez Cueto, Y., Hernández Contreras, R. E., Garduño Ruíz, E. P., Alatorre Mendieta, M. Á., & Silva, R. (2021). Validation of sea-surface temperature data for potential OTEC deployment in the Mexican Pacific. Energies, 14(7), 1898
  10. Wu, H., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2022). Nutrient recovery from wastewater: A review on the integrated Physicochemical technologies of ammonia stripping, adsorption and struvite precipitation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 433, 133664
  11. Méndez-Mateos, D., Barrio, V. L., Requies, J. M., & Cambra, J. F. (2020). A study of deactivation by H 2 S and regeneration of a Ni catalyst supported on Al 2 O 3, during methanation of CO 2. Effect of the promoters Co, Cr, Fe and Mo. RSC advances, 10(28), 16551-16564
  12. Yeo, C. E., Seo, M., Kim, D., Jeong, C., Shin, H. S., & Kim, S. (2021). Optimization of operating conditions for CO2 methanation process using design of experiments. Energies, 14(24), 8414
  13. Li, W. X., Huo, B. J., Huang, J. Y., Rao, W., Xu, H., Zhou, X., & Shen, Z. L. (2024). Nickel-catalyzed cross-electrophile coupling of unactivated (hetero) aryl sulfone with aryl bromide. Journal of Catalysis, 430, 115359
  14. Duan, H., Jia, M., Chang, Y., & Liu, H. (2019). Experimental study on the influence of low-temperature combustion (LTC) mode and fuel properties on cyclic variations in a compression-ignition engine. Fuel, 256, 115907
  15. Champon, I., Bengaouer, A., Chaise, A., Thomas, S., & Roger, A. C. (2019). Carbon dioxide methanation kinetic model on a commercial Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 34, 256-265
  16. Varandas, B., Oliveira, M., Andrade, C., & Borges, A. (2024). Thermodynamic Equilibrium Analysis of CO2 Methanation through Equilibrium Constants: A Comparative Simulation Study. Physchem, 4(3), 258-271
  17. Floriam, B. G., Barros, L. M., Bineli, A. R., & Maciel Filho, R. (2025). CO2 Methanation: Thermodynamic Simulations for Enhanced Methane Production and Hydrogen Source Evaluation. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 117, 61-66

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.