DOI: https://doi.org/10.9767/jcerp.20745

Response Surface Optimization of Setting Time and Compressive Strength of a Clay–Bauxite Geopolymer Binder for Oil-Well Cementing

1Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Al-Sultan Abdullah, Lebuhraya Persiaran Tun Khalil Yaakob 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

2Faculty of Medicine, Widad University College, BIM Point, Bandar Indera Mahkota, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

Received: 18 May 2026; Revised: 1 Aug 2026; Accepted: 3 Aug 2026; Available online: 5 Aug 2026; Published: 26 Dec 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The development of sustainable cement alternatives has intensified interest in alkali‐activated binders formulated from abundant clay minerals. In this study, a clay-based geopolymer binder was synthesized and optimized by investigating the combined influence of activated clay loading (10-100 g), bauxite loading (0-150 g), alkaline activator dosage (0-3 g), and curing temperature (90-150 °C) on its setting time and compressive strength. A Central Composite Design (CCD) under Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to model the responses and determine optimal processing conditions. The experimental results revealed that both responses were significantly influenced by the synergy between the activator dosage and raw material loading. Increasing activated clay and bauxite content accelerated geopolymerization, leading to shortened setting time, whereas excessive activator addition resulted in delayed matrix hardening due to excess soluble silicate–aluminate species. Compressive strength increased with increasing precursor loading up to a threshold level, beyond which incomplete dissolution restricted polycondensation. Regression analysis demonstrated excellent agreement between predicted and experimental values, with no transformation required, as confirmed by Box–Cox analysis. The normality and independence of residuals were verified through residual plots against predicted values and experimental runs. Optimization using a desirability function achieved a setting time of 6 h and compressive strength of 40.44 MPa at optimal conditions of activated clay (55 g), bauxite (75 g), activator dosage (1.5 g), and curing temperature (120 °C), with a global desirability of 1.000. These results confirm RSM as an effective statistical tool for tailoring the performance of clay-based geopolymers, offering a promising pathway for developing high-strength, fast-setting, sustainable binders. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Keywords: Clay-based geopolymer; Response Surface Methodology (RSM); Setting time optimization; Compressive strength; Central Composite Design (CCD)
Funding: Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA) under contract FRGS Grant Number (RDU220376).

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Application of Transition Metal Nitride Catalyst in the HDO Reaction of Lignin and Its Model Compounds Lignocellulosic Biomass into Mass-Producible Fuels A Critical Review of Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Upgrading Strategies Production and Characterization of Polyurethane-Based Artificial Leather Using Release Paper Technology Effect of Temperature and Pressure Variation on CO₂ Methanation Performance in a PFR Reactor Using Ni/Al₂O₃ Catalyst Parametric Optimization of Solvent Extraction of Soybean Oil More recent articles
  1. Hassan. S, Sivakumar, M. Alade, A.O. Ganesan, S. Miskam, M. (2025). Compressive strength of clay-based geopolymers: A concise review of the influencing factors and underlying mechanisms, Appl. Clay Sci., 278, 107985. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2025.107985
  2. Xu, W., Briffaut, M., Gay, N., Shao, J. (2025). Experimental investigation on the physical and mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers: Effects of aging and confining pressure, Appl. Clay Sci., 276, 107910. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2025.107910
  3. Ettahiri, Y. (2023). Comparative study of physicochemical properties of geopolymers prepared by four Moroccan natural clays, Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 108021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108021
  4. Barima, M., Siti, Q.A.B.M., Ismail, N. Rayan, H.M., Abutu, D., Agi, A.A. (2025). Clay-Based Geopolymers Cement for Oil Wells: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. Clay Science - Bridging Geology and Physical Chemistry, IntechOpen, 1-27. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1011806
  5. Siyal, A.A., Hamidi, R.M., Shamsuddin, R.M.R., Mohamed, M.S.R., Ilyas, S.U. (2025). Optimization of flexural strength in fly ash-based geopolymers through response surface methodology, Coatings, 16 (4), 1706–1718. DOI: 10.1007/s43995-025-00205-1
  6. Chen, W., Dong, B., Peng, K.-D., Yang, Q., Wang, Y., Hong, S. (2024). Optimization of microstructure and mechanical performance of clay-rich sand-washing slurry-based geopolymers, Applied Clay Science, 260, 107551. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2024.107551
  7. Elataoui, K. (2024). Exploring the diversity of clays: Impacts of temperature on physicochemical changes, mechanical characteristics, and permeability, and their relevance to membrane applications, Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio, 63(6), 398–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.bsecv.2024.07.001
  8. Barima, M. (2025). A review on advancing clay-based geopolymers for high-temperature oil well cements: Mechanisms, durability, and applications. Petroleum Research, 11(1), 274-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2025.08.005
  9. Singh, N.B., Kumar, M., Rai, S. (2020). Geopolymer cement and concrete: Properties, Materials Today: Proceedings, 29, 743–748. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.513
  10. Zamanian, M., Payan, M., Afsharnia, N. (2026). Thermo-mechanical behavior of clays: Divergent responses of kaolinite and montmorillonite in temperature-controlled shear tests, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 80, 107857. DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2026.107857
  11. Barima, M. (2025). Appraising the Impact of Activated Clay Geopolymer as a Sustainable Geopolymer Cement for Oilwell Applications. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, DOI: 10.2118/228642-MS
  12. Almutairi, A.L., Tayeh, B.A., Adesina, A., Isleem, H.F., Zeyad, A.M. (2025). Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00733. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733
  13. Khasawneh, M.A. (2025). Geopolymer concrete in construction projects: a review, Discov. Civ. Eng., 2(1), 124. DOI: 10.1007/s44290-025-00281-1
  14. Ikotun, J.O., Aderinto, G.E., Madirisha, M.M., Katte, V.Y. (2024). Geopolymer Cement in Pavement Applications: Bridging Sustainability and Performance, Sustainability, 16(13), 5417. DOI: 10.3390/su16135417
  15. Wan, Q., Rao, F., Song, S., León-Patiño, C.A. (2017). Geothermal clay-based geopolymer binders: Synthesis and microstructural characterization, Applied Clay Science, 146, 23–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.047
  16. Mostafa, N.Y., Mohsen, Q., El-maghraby, A. (2014). Characterization of low-purity clays for geopolymer binder formulation, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 21(6), 609–619. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-014-0949-y
  17. Sam-Tunsa, A.A., Epey, N., Nana, A., Tome, S., Mache, J.R., Nchare, M. (2022). Mineralogical and physicochemical characterization of clayey materials from Meiganga (Adamawa-Cameroon): potential application in traditional ceramic, J. Build. Rehabil., 7(1), 65. DOI: 10.1007/s41024-022-00203-z
  18. Adjei, S., Elkatatny, S., Aggrey, W.N., Abdelraouf, Y. (2022). Geopolymer as the future oil-well cement: A review, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208, 109485. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109485
  19. Migunthanna, J., Rajeev, P., Sanjayan, J. (2022). Waste Clay Bricks as a Geopolymer Binder for Pavement Construction, Sustainability, 14(11), 6456. DOI: 10.3390/su14116456
  20. Buyondo, K.A., Olupot, P.W., Kirabira, J.B., Yusuf, A.A. (2020). Optimization of production parameters for rice husk ash-based geopolymer cement using response surface methodology, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00461, DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00461
  21. Agrawal, A., Malviya, N. (2025). Advanced geopolymer concrete with coconut fiber reinforcement: optimizing strength, durability, and predictive modelling for sustainable construction, Archit. Struct. Constr., 5(1), 39. DOI: 10.1007/s44150-025-00152-4
  22. Tome, S. (2022). Structural and Physico-mechanical Investigations of Mine Tailing-Calcined Kaolinite Based Phosphate Geopolymer Binder, Silicon, 14(7), 3563–3570. DOI: 10.1007/s12633-021-01137-w
  23. Mahmoodi, O., Siad, H., Lachemi, M., Dadsetan, S., Sahmaran, M. (2020). Optimization of brick waste-based geopolymer binders at ambient temperature and pre-targeted chemical parameters, Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122285
  24. Kumari, N., Mohan, C., Negi, A. (2023). An Investigative Study on the Structural, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Clay-Based PVC Polymer Composite Films, Polymers, 15(8), 1922. DOI: 10.3390/polym15081922
  25. Barima, M. (2025). Characterization of Kuala Rompin clay (KRC) and empty fruit bunch ash (EFBA) for potential application in the formulation of geopolymer cement, Discov. Concr. Cem., 1(1), 12. DOI: 10.1007/s44416-025-00012-w
  26. Kaze, C.R. (2022). Thermal behaviour and microstructural evolution of metakaolin and meta-halloysite-based geopolymer binders: a comparative study, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 147(3), 2055–2071. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-021-10555-2
  27. Yin, R., Zhu, L., Cheng, D., Liang, P., Gao, R. (2026). Multi-Objective Optimization Design of a Metakaolin–Slag-Based Binary Solid Waste Geopolymer Mortar Mix Proportion Using Response Surface Methodology, Buildings, 16(2), 402. DOI: 10.3390/buildings16020402
  28. Quiatchon, P.R.J. (2021). Investigation on the Compressive Strength and Time of Setting of Low-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Paste Using Response Surface Methodology, Polymers, 13(20), 3461. DOI: 10.3390/polym13203461
  29. Lekshmi, S., Sudhakumar, J. (2022). An assessment on the durability performance of fly ash-clay based geopolymer mortar containing clay enhanced with lime and GGBS, Cleaner Materials, 5, 100129. DOI: 10.1016/j.clema.2022.100129
  30. Neufville, E.K., Kanali, C., Mogire, P. (2024). Assessing the Mechanical and Micro-Structural Properties of Concrete with Silica Fume and Coconut Shell as Partial Replacements of Cement and Fine Aggregates, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 11(4), 39–53. DOI: 10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I4P105
  31. Khalid, L.W., Mermerdaş, K., Ekmen, Ş., Khidhir Bzeni, D. (2026). Optimization of fresh and hardened properties of fiber-reinforced 3D printed geopolymer composites using response surface Methodology: A data-driven approach based on prior experimental studies, Journal of Building Engineering, 117, 114655. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114655
  32. David. A. (2025). Reinforcing concrete with nano-enhanced bio-additives: a path toward sustainable construction materials, Discov. Concr. Cem., 1(1), 20. DOI: 10.1007/s44416-025-00022-8
  33. Abolhasani, A., Samali, B., Dehestani, M., Libre, N.A. (2022). Effect of rice husk ash on mechanical properties, fracture energy, brittleness and aging of calcium aluminate cement concrete, Structures, 36, 140–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.054
  34. Wang, W.Lv.B., Zhang, C., Li, N., Pu, S. (2023). Mechanical and micro-structure characteristics of cement-treated expansive soil admixed with nano-MgO, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 82(2), 48. DOI: 10.1007/s10064-022-03055-6
  35. Kamali, M., Khalifeh, M., Saasen, A., Godøy, R., Delabroy, L. (2021). Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 201, 108455. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108455
  36. Armah, E.A., Koffi, H.A., Amuzu, J.K.A. (2020). Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Concrete Containing Ground Palm Kernel Shells as Partial Replacement of Cement, Journal of Modern Materials, 7(1), 7–16. DOI: 10.21467/jmm.7.1.7-16
  37. Bayuaji, R. Kurniawan, R. W. Yasin, A. K. Fatoni, H. A. Lutfi, F. M. A. (2016). The effect of fly ash and coconut fibre ash as cement replacement materials on cement paste strength, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 128, 012014. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/128/1/012014
  38. Edeh, J.C., Peters, J.F., Eni-Ikeh, S.N., Abuh, M.A., Ndubisi, P.C. (2024). Reinforcement of cement tiles with palm kernel shell particles as natural fibre, Nigerian Journal of Technology, 43(1), 64–70. DOI: 10.4314/njt.v43i1.9
  39. Wang, W. (2021). Influence of Carbonization Process on the Mechanical Properties of Nano-MgO Modified Cement Soil, Sustainability, 13(6), 3558. DOI: 10.3390/su13063558
  40. Nwaichi, P.I., Ridzuan, N., Nwaichi, E.O., Umunnawuike, C., Abutu, D., Nyah, F., Money, B., Agi, A. (2025). Advances in oilwell cement retarders: a bibliometric and systematic review of mechanisms, challenges, emerging trends, and future directions. Discover Concrete and Cement, 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44416-025-00008-6
  41. Lumbab, J.S., Bongo, J., Moralde, R.M., Villaceran, G.I. (2023). Coconut Shell Ash as Partial Substitute to Cement in Concrete Hollow Blocks, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 1184(1), 012024, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1184/1/012024
  42. Money, B., Shaarani, S.H.N., Modather, R.H., Abutu, D., Mahat, S.Q. (2026). Clay-based geopolymer cement with industrial additives for improved rheological thermal and microstructural performance. Discov. Concr. Cem. 2(1), 29. DOI: 10.1007/s44416-026-00071-7
  43. Mahat, S.Q.A., Nwaichi, P.I., Umunnawuike, C., Nyah, F., Abutu, D., Money, B., Gbonhinbor, J.R., Nwaichi, E.O., Agi, A. (2025). Optimizing Drilling Fluid Performance with Green Inhibitors. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition. DOI: 10.2118/228648-MS
  44. Al_Ani, M., Sidek, M.A., Jaafar, M.Z., Gbonhinbor, J.R., Abutu, D., Money, B., Agi, A. (2025). Synthesis, Characterization and Oil Recovery Mechanisms of a Novel Polymeric Nanofluid for High Temperature and High salinity Oil Reservoirs. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition. DOI: 10.2118/228636-MS
  45. Money, B., Mahat, S.Q.A.B., Ismail, N., Aziz, M.A.B.A., Randy, G.J., Modather, R.H., Umunnawuike, C., Nwaichi, P.I., Nyah, F., David, A., Agi, A. (2025). A Comprehensive Approach to Health, Safety, and Environmental Sustainability in Drilling: Balancing Operational Efficiency with Safety Standards. SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, DOI: 10.2118/228635-MS
  46. Nyah, F., Ridzuan, N., Epelle, E., Bin Abd Aziz, M.A., Money, B., Abutu, D., Agi, A. (2025). Cellulose Bionanomaterial Design for Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Review of Existing, Emerging Technologies and Future Outlook. Petroleum Research, 11(2), 641-686. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2025.12.002

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.