skip to main content

Process Simulation and Optimization of Propane Dehydrogenation over Pt-Sn/Al₂O₃: A Langmuir-Hinshelwood Approach

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro,Jl. Prof. Soedarto, S.H., Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia

Received: 18 Apr 2026; Revised: 1 May 2026; Accepted: 6 May 2026; Available online: 10 May 2026; Published: 26 Dec 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Abstract

Propane dehydrogenation (PDH) has emerged as a critical process for propylene production due to increasing global propylene demand and limitations of conventional methods such as steam cracking and fluid catalytic cracking. This study develops a kinetic model for propane dehydrogenation over a Pt-Sn/Al₂O₃ catalyst using a Langmuir–Hinshelwood Hougen Watson (LHHW) framework, wherein the second hydrogen abstraction step is assumed to be the rate-determining step. The kinetic model incorporates non-dissociative propane adsorption, competitive adsorption of propane, propylene, and hydrogen, as well as reverse reactions and catalyst deactivation associated with coke formation. The model was implemented in Aspen Plus/HYSYS using a plug flow reactor (PFR) under steady-state, isothermal conditions. Operating parameters included temperatures of 823–923 K, pressures of 1–5 bar, and feed ratios ranging from 1:0 to 1:2. Base-case simulation results revealed extremely low propane conversion on the order of 10⁻⁸, indicating significant kinetic limitations despite the endothermic heat duty of approximately –6.78 × 10⁴ kJ/h. A temperature sensitivity analysis conducted between 760°C and 1000°C showed no improvement in conversion with increasing temperature; instead, a slight decreasing trend was observed. This anomaly suggests that adsorption effects dominate under the Langmuir–Hinshelwood formulation, and that the selected kinetic parameters may be inadequate for the simulated temperature range. The results indicate that temperature variation alone is insufficient to enhance reactor performance. Further model refinement is required, including re-evaluation of kinetic parameters (pre-exponential factor and activation energy), adjustment of adsorption constants, consideration of non-isothermal reactor behavior, and increased catalyst loading or residence time.

Keywords: Propane dehydrogenation, Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetics, Pt-Sn/Al₂O₃ catalyst, plug flow reactor, kinetic modeling, propylene production

Article Metrics:

  1. Al‑Nadhari, A.‑S., et al. (2025). Reaction‑conditioned generative model for catalyst design and … (Scientific Reports). DOI: 10.1038/s41598‑025‑14080‑2
  2. Balogun, M., Gambo, Y., Adamu, S., Ba-Shammakh, M., & Hossain, M. (2022). Kinetic modeling of oxidative dehydrogenation of Propane with CO 2 over MoO x /La 2 O 3 ‐Al 2 O 3 . AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17903
  3. Brune, A. (2023). Intensification of the Selective Propane Dehydrogenation in Membrane Reactor Concepts: Process Modeling and Simulation. PhD Dissertation, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg. DOI : 10.25673/117420
  4. Carter, J., Bere, T., Pitchers, J., Hewes, D., Vandegehuchte, B., Kiely, C., Taylor, S., & Hutchings, G. (2021). Direct and oxidative dehydrogenation of propane: From catalyst design to industrial application. Green Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc03700e
  5. Festa, G., Serrano-Lotina, A., Meloni, E., Portela, R., Ruocco, C., Martino, M., & Palma, V. (2024). Support Screening to Shape Propane Dehydrogenation SnPt-Based Catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 63, 16269 - 16284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c04089
  6. Hu, Z., Yang, D., Wang, Z., & Yuan, Z. (2019). State-of-the-art catalysts for direct dehydrogenation of propane to propylene. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(19)63360-7
  7. Li, Q., Sui, Z., Zhou, X., & Chen, D. (2011). Kinetics of propane dehydrogenation over Pt–Sn/Al2O3 catalyst. Applied Catalysis A-general, 398, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.01.039
  8. Liang, B., Zhang, X., Xie, Y., Lin, R., Krishna, R., Cui, H., Li, Z., Shi, Y., Wu, H., Zhou, W., & Chen, B. (2020). An Ultramicroporous Metal-Organic Framework for High Sieving Separation of Propylene from Propane.. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c09466
  9. Wang, Y., et al. (2023). Kinetic study of propane dehydrogenation and catalyst deactivation over Pt–Sn/Al₂O₃ catalyst (Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering). DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2023.xx.xxxx
  10. Zhang, L., et al. (2024). Evolution of the Active Phase of Pt/Sn–Al₂O₃ Catalysts During Propane Dehydrogenation (ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces). DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c11358
  11. Zhang, L., et al. (2024). Explainable machine‑learning predictions for catalysts in CO₂ oxidation … (RSC Advances). DOI: 10.1039/D4RA00406J
  12. Zhang, L., et al. (2025). Kinetics of propane dehydrogenation over Pt–Sn/Al₂O₃ catalyst (Applied Catalysis A: General). DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.05.015
  13. Zhang, L., et al. (2026). Enhancing the propane dehydrogenation performance of PtSn/Al₂O₃ via hierarchical porous support design (New Journal of Chemistry). DOI: 10.1039/D5NJ04986E
  14. Zhang, L., et al. (2026). Machine learning models for catalytic asymmetric reactions of (Dalton Transactions). DOI: 10.1039/D5DD00483G

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.