1Faculty of Energy Science, Kim II Sung University, Pyongyang 999093, North Korea
2Analytical Measurement Laboratory, Kim Il Sung University, Pyongyang 999093, North Korea
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JCERP20715, author = {Guk Chol Kim and Jong Hyok Kim and Yong A. Choe and Jin Song O}, title = {Lignite-Derived Activated Carbon: A Superior, Low-Cost Alternative to Coconut-Shell GAC for Tributyl Phosphate (TBP) Adsorption from Wastewater}, journal = {Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, year = {2026}, keywords = {TBP (tributyl phosphate), lignite; GAC (granular activated carbon); adsorption amount; equilibration time; adsorption rate}, abstract = { This study examined the use of local lignite-based and walnut shell-based GACs as potential low-cost alternatives to the imported coconut shell-based GACs for the removal of TBP from wastewaters in Zr alloy production. The lignite-based GAC steam activated showed that the surface groups consisted of –OH, C=C, and C–O–C and that it had a predominantly mesoporous structure (65% mesopores and 20% micropores). At a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:100 and an initial concentration of 400 mg/L of TBP, the GAC derived from lignite adsorbed 38.7 mg/g with an efficiency of 96.2%. This result was comparable to the coconut shell GAC, which adsorbed 39.8 mg/g with an efficiency of 99.5%. The walnut shell GAC had a slightly higher adsorption capacity than the other two GACs, with 39.7 mg/g and an efficiency of 99.6%. In all cases, equilibrium was reached in 120 min, while the literature usually reports 150–180 min. This may be because the intraparticle diffusion is accelerated when the mesopore content is high; in this GAC, the mesopores accounted for 65% of the volume. This kinetic advantage distinguishes domestically produced GACs from predominantly microporous coconut-shell GAC. Economically, lignite-derived GAC showed superior cost-effectiveness, with a production cost less than one-fifth that of imported coconut-shell GAC. The economic effectiveness index clearly favoured domestically produced GACs. Lignite-derived GAC, originally used almost exclusively for gas purification, was successfully validated for liquid-phase TBP removal, an application with no prior example. Thus, domestically produced lignite-derived GAC is an effective, low-cost alternative to imported coconut-shell GAC for TBP removal from Zr alloy production wastewater. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 ). }, issn = {3032-7059}, pages = {219--226} doi = {10.9767/jcerp.20715}, url = {https://journal.bcrec.id/index.php/jcerp/article/view/20715} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This study examined the use of local lignite-based and walnut shell-based GACs as potential low-cost alternatives to the imported coconut shell-based GACs for the removal of TBP from wastewaters in Zr alloy production. The lignite-based GAC steam activated showed that the surface groups consisted of –OH, C=C, and C–O–C and that it had a predominantly mesoporous structure (65% mesopores and 20% micropores). At a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:100 and an initial concentration of 400 mg/L of TBP, the GAC derived from lignite adsorbed 38.7 mg/g with an efficiency of 96.2%. This result was comparable to the coconut shell GAC, which adsorbed 39.8 mg/g with an efficiency of 99.5%. The walnut shell GAC had a slightly higher adsorption capacity than the other two GACs, with 39.7 mg/g and an efficiency of 99.6%. In all cases, equilibrium was reached in 120 min, while the literature usually reports 150–180 min. This may be because the intraparticle diffusion is accelerated when the mesopore content is high; in this GAC, the mesopores accounted for 65% of the volume. This kinetic advantage distinguishes domestically produced GACs from predominantly microporous coconut-shell GAC. Economically, lignite-derived GAC showed superior cost-effectiveness, with a production cost less than one-fifth that of imported coconut-shell GAC. The economic effectiveness index clearly favoured domestically produced GACs. Lignite-derived GAC, originally used almost exclusively for gas purification, was successfully validated for liquid-phase TBP removal, an application with no prior example. Thus, domestically produced lignite-derived GAC is an effective, low-cost alternative to imported coconut-shell GAC for TBP removal from Zr alloy production wastewater. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Authors who publish in the Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress (JCERP) retain full copyright ownership of their work. In keeping with the journal’s commitment to open access, all articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
This license permits anyone to access, use, share, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author or authors, a link to the license is provided, changes to the work (if any) are clearly indicated, and any derivative works are distributed under the same license.
Authors are encouraged to disseminate their work as widely as possible. They retain the right to reuse their published article in future scholarly works, such as books, conference presentations, or teaching materials. They may also deposit the final published version in institutional or subject-based repositories, and share it freely on personal websites, academic platforms, or professional networks. These rights are fully preserved under the CC BY-SA license, and all such uses must comply with its terms.
Readers and third parties may also use the content in accordance with the CC BY-SA license. This includes the ability to reproduce, modify, and build upon the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as proper attribution is given, and any resulting work is distributed under the same license.
License to Publish Agreement (Non-Exclusive License for Publishing Rights)
To enable publication and global dissemination of accepted manuscripts, the Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress is published by UPT Laboratorium Terpadu Universitas Diponegoro jointly with Masyarakat Katalis Indonesia - Indonesian Catalyst Society (MKICS) Publisher, and the technical management of the JCERP journal is supported by with BCREC Publishing Group, requires that authors grant the publisher a non-exclusive license to publish the work. This license authorizes the publisher to reproduce, distribute, and communicate the article to the public in all forms and media. The license to publish does not transfer copyright; authors remain the sole copyright holders.
This arrangement is formalized through a License to Publish Agreement, which the corresponding author must complete after the manuscript is accepted for publication. The agreement confirms that the author or authors grant the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article and to distribute it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Authors retain all other rights to their work. They remain free to use and share their article in any manner consistent with the terms of the CC BY-SA license, including in future publications, educational settings, and commercial applications, provided proper attribution is given and the license is preserved.
After acceptance, the corresponding author will receive an email containing instructions for completing and electronically signing the License to Publish Agreement. The signed agreement must be returned to the Editorial Office in order to proceed with publication. The License to Publish Agreement form is available for download on the journal’s official website.
The non-exclusive Transfer Agreement for Publishing Right (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here: [Transfer Agreement for Publishing Right (CTAP) Form JCERP 2024]
The (non-exclusive) publishing right form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below: Prof. Dr. I. Istadi (Editor-in-Chief)Editorial Office of Journal of Chemical Engineering Researc ProgressLaboratory of Plasma-Catalysis (R3.5), UPT Laboratorium Terpadu, Universitas DiponegoroJl. Prof. Soedarto, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275Telp/Whatsapp: +62-81-316426342E-mail: jcerp[at]live.undip.ac.id
(This policy statements has been updated at 25th March 2025)
View statistics
The Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress is published by UPT Laboratorium Terpadu Universitas Diponegoro jointly with Masyarakat Katalis Indonesia - Indonesian Catalyst Society (MKICS) Publisher. The technical management of the JCERP journal is supported by with BCREC Publishing Group.