skip to main content

Optimization and Modification of the Hydrogen Peroxide to Propylene Oxide (HPPO) Process

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 13 Jun 2025; Revised: 26 Jun 2025; Accepted: 28 Jun 2025; Available online: 1 Jul 2025; Published: 30 Dec 2025.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The production of Propylene Oxide (PO) through the Hydrogen Peroxide to Propylene Oxide (HPPO) process represents a cleaner and more efficient route compared to conventional methods. This project focuses on the design and feasibility of a chemical plant with an annual capacity of 10,000 tons of PO using propylene and hydrogen peroxide as feedstocks. The HPPO process, catalyzed by a titanium silicate (TS-1) catalyst, offers significant environmental and economic advantages, such as reduced by-products and lower energy consumption. The core reaction occurs in a convergent reactor under mild operating conditions, producing PO with water as the only by-product, thus minimizing environmental impact. This study focuses on process intensification and optimization of the Hydrogen Peroxide to Propylene Oxide (HPPO) process, with the goal of improving energy efficiency, enhancing mass utilization, optimizing reactor operating conditions, and minimizing waste generation through targeted process modifications. The results demonstrate that the HPPO process is a sustainable and economically viable option for small to medium-scale PO production, aligning with green chemistry principles and industrial scalability. Copyright © 2025 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Keywords: Propylene Oxide; HPPO Process; Process Design; Process intensification

Article Metrics:

  1. Nigussie, G.Y., Tsai, Y.F., Yang, C.T., Yang, M.C., Yu, S.S.F. (2025). An efficient H₂O₂-based propylene to propylene oxide (HPPO) reaction catalyzed by ZnO/ZnO₂ materials, J. Mater. Chem. A, 13, 5261. DOI: 10.1039/d4ta08256g
  2. Shchutskyi, I.V. (2021). New HPPOa technology for propylene oxide production: from laboratory reactor to pilot installation, Catalysis and Petrochemistry, 32. DOI: 10.15407/kataliz2021.32.001
  3. Salucci, E., Russo, V., Salmi, T., Serio, D.M., Tesser, R. (2021). Intraparticle Model for Non Uniform Active Phase Distribution in HPPO Catalysts, ChemEngineering, 1-27. DOI: 10.3390/chemengineering5030038
  4. Xia, C., Lin, M., Zhu, X., Peng, Y., Shu, W. (2023). Efficient and robust hydrogen peroxide propylene oxide (HPPO) process, Hydrocarbon Processing, 1-15. DOI: 10.1134/S2070050420030095
  5. Alvear, M., Orabona, F., Eranen, K. (2022). Epoxidation of light olefin mixtures with hydrogen peroxide on TS-1 in a laboratory-scale trickle bed reactor: Transient experimental study and mathematical modelling, Chem. Eng. Sci., 269, 118467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.118467
  6. Lin, M., Xia, C., Zhu, B., Li, H., Shu, X. (2016). Green and efficient epoxidation of propylene with hydrogen peroxide (HPPO process) catalyzed by hollow TS-1 zeolite: A 1.0 kt/a pilot-scale study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 295, 370-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.072
  7. Yu, F.S., Yang, M.C., Yang, C.T., Tsai. F.Y., Nigussie, Y.G. (2025). An efficient H2O2-based propylene to propylene oxide (HPPO) reaction catalyzed by ZnO/ZnO2 materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 13, 5261-5274. DOI: 10.1039/d4ta08256g
  8. Zhu, Y., Li, X., Wang, J., Liu, H. (2021). Thermodynamic modeling and simulation of methanol–water separation using NRTL and UNIQUAC models. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29, 375–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.08.012
  9. Hamadneh, S., Al-Muhtaseb, A.H., Almomani, F. (2022). Numerical study of converging–diverging tubular reactors using CFD: Heat and mass transfer implications. Chemical Engineering Science, 258, 117733. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.117733
  10. Russo, N., Bagnasco, G., Falletta, E., Boffito, D.C. (2018). Experimental and kinetic study of propylene oxide production via hydrogen peroxide in a continuous stirred tank reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 347, 801–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.215
  11. Yang, J., Liu, S., Liu, Y. (2024). Review and perspectives on TS-1 catalyzed propylene epoxidation, iSciences, 27, 1-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109064
  12. Chen, C.Y., Hung, K.S., Lee, Y.H., Chien, L.I. (2015). Energy-Saving Designs for Close-Boiling Separation, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54, 1-15. DOI: 10.1021/ie503922f
  13. Sisay, W.M. (2020). Sensitivity Analysis, Economic Evaluation and Heat Integration of a DME Plant from Methanol, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 13, 1-9. DOI: 10.1027/09757384
  14. Keil, J.F. (2018). Process Intensification, Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 34, 135-200. DOI: 10.1515/revce-2017-0085
  15. Wang, Q., Yang, Z., Wang, J., Huang, Z., Yang, C., Wang, H., Qiu, T. (2023). A multi-scale and multi-objective optimization strategy for catalytic distillation process, Chemical Engineering Science, 265, 118221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.1182210009-2509

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.