DOI: https://doi.org/10.9767/jcerp.20104

Improving Energy Efficiency with Heat Exchanger and Optimizing Operating Conditions for Sorbitol Production from Dextrose

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 28 Dec 2023; Revised: 26 Jan 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2024; Available online: 27 Jan 2024; Published: 30 Jun 2024.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi, Teguh Riyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

Sorbitol is a sugar alcohol which has a molecular formula of C6H14O6. The production of sorbitol by the hydrogenation process is carried out at high pressure so that a large amount of energy is required. The use of considerable energy in the production process supports the need for innovation for energy efficiency in the production of sorbitol from dextrose, which is expected to help increase sorbitol production so that it can meet market needs. The innovation carried out here is to change the operating conditions with the help of Ru/ASMA@AC catalyst so that the temperature required during the reaction is low. In addition, modifying the use of heat exchanger units so that the heat generated during operation is reused. These innovations were simulated using Aspen HYSYS software. The results of the simulation proved to be able to improve energy efficiency by reducing the performance of compressors and coolers used during production and saving considerable energy. Copyright © 2024 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Supporting Information (SI) PDF
Keywords: sorbitol; dextrose; glucose; heat exchanger; energy efficiency

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Improving Energy Efficiency with Heat Exchanger and Optimizing Operating Conditions for Sorbitol Production from Dextrose Reducing Energy Consumption in the Synthesis of Dimethyl Ether (DME) from Methanol Dehydration by Modifying Heat Transfer Unit Using Aspen HYSYS Enhancing Energy Efficiency of Cumene Production Through Reactor Output Recycling Modification in a Heat Exchanger More recent articles
  1. Akmalina, R. (2019). Environmental impacts evaluation of sorbitol production from glucose. Eksergi, 16(1), 7-12
  2. – Chamnipa, N., Klanrit, P., Thanonkeo, S., & Thanonkeo, P. (2022). Sorbitol production from a mixture of sugarcane bagasse and cassava pulp hydrolysates using thermotolerant Zymomonas mobilis TISTR548. Industrial Crops and Products, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115741
  3. – Galán, G., Martín, M., & Grossmann, I. E. (2021). Integrated Renewable Production of Sorbitol and Xylitol from Switchgrass. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(15), 5558–5573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00397
  4. – Ribeiro, L. S., de Melo Órfão, J. J., & Pereira, M. F. R. (2017). Simultaneous catalytic conversion of cellulose and corncob xylan under temperature programming for enhanced sorbitol and xylitol production. Bioresource technology, 244, 1173-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.015
  5. – Zhang, J., Wu, S. B., & Liu, Y. (2014). Direct conversion of cellulose into sorbitol over a magnetic catalyst in an extremely low concentration acid system. Energy & Fuels, 28(7), 4242-4246. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500031w
  6. – Zhang, Q., Akri, M., Yang, Y., & Qiao, B. (2023). Atomically Dispersed Metals as Potential Coke-Resistant Catalysts for Dry Deforming of Methane. In Cell Reports Physical Science (Vol. 4, Issue 3). Cell Press
  7. – Sheet, B. S., Artik, N., Ayed, M. A., & Abdulaziz, O. F. (2014). Some Alternative Sweeteners (Xylitol, Sorbitol, Sucralose and Stevia): Review. In Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi / Karaelmas Science and Engineering Journal (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.7212/ZKUFBD.V4I1.125
  8. – Xi, R., Tang, Y., Smith, R. L., Liu, X., Liu, L., & Qi, X. (2023). Selective hydrogenation of glucose to sorbitol with tannic acid-based porous carbon sphere supported Ni–Ru bimetallic catalysts. Green Energy and Environment, 8(6), 1719–1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2022.04.003
  9. – Urbanus. (1980). Werkwijze om sorbitol te bereiden door hydrogeneren van glucose. In Urbanus (Ed.), ATerinzagelegging. Hydrocarbon Research Inc
  10. – Van Gorp, K., Boerman, E., Cavenaghi, C. V, & Berben, P. H. (n.d.). Catalytic hydrogenation of ®ne chemicals: sorbitol production
  11. – Bagnato, G., & Sanna, A. (2017). Thermodynamic and economic analysis of lignocellulosic bio-oil upgrading by hydrogenation. In 2017 International Conference on Coal Science & Technology and 2017 Australia-China Symposium on Energy
  12. – Zhao, J., Yang, X., Wang, W., Liang, J., Orooji, Y., Dai, C., Fu, X., Yang, Y., Xu, W., & Zhu, J. (2020). Efficient sorbitol producing process through glucose hydrogenation catalyzed by ru supported amino poly (Styrene-co-maleic) polymer (asma) encapsulated on γ-al2o3. Catalysts, 10(9), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10091068
  13. – Alshbuki, E. H., Bey, M. M., & Mohamed, A. Ala. (2020). Simulation Production of Dimethylether (DME) from Dehydration of Methanol Using Aspen Hysys. Scholars International Journal of Chemistry and Material Sciences, 03(02), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijcms.2020.v03i02.002
  14. – Sladkovskiy, D. A., Godina, L. I., Semikin, K. V., Sladkovskaya, E. V., Smirnova, D. A., & Murzin, D. Y. (2018). Process design and techno-economical analysis of hydrogen production by aqueous phase reforming of sorbitol. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 134, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.03.041
  15. – Patel, A. (2023). Heat Exchangers in Industrial Applications: Efficiency and Optimization Strategies. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 12(9). http://www.ijert.org
  16. – Yang, X., Li, X., Zhao, J., Liang, J., & Zhu, J. (2023). Production of Sorbitol via Hydrogenation of Glucose over Ruthenium Coordinated with Amino Styrene-co-maleic Anhydride Polymer Encapsulated on Activated Carbon (Ru/ASMA@AC) Catalyst. Molecules, 28(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124830
  17. – Godini, H. R., Azadi, M., Penteado, A., Khadivi, M., Wozny, G., & Repke, J. U. (2019). A multi-perspectives analysis of methane oxidative coupling process based on miniplant-scale experimental data. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 151, 56–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.08.002
  18. – Pranolo, S. H., Muzayanha, S. U., Yudha, C. S., Hasanah, L. M., & Shohih, E. N. (2018). Kajian Konsumsi Energi Spesifik Sektor Industri Kimia Di Indonesia Sebagai Acuan Efisiensi Energi. Prosiding SNTK Eco-SMART, 1(1)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.