DOI: https://doi.org/10.9767/jcerp.20593

Process Modification for Energy Demand Reduction in Acetic Acid Production

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Received: 12 Dec 2025; Revised: 19 Dec 2025; Accepted: 24 Dec 2025; Available online: 9 Jan 2026; Published: 30 Jun 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

Methanol carbonylation via the Cativa Process is the dominant technology for acetic acid production, offering high selectivity and operational efficiency. In the initial design of plants based on this process, however, heating energy demand was substantial, particularly during the methanol preheating stage prior to compression, which increased operating costs. Energy optimization is therefore critical to improving the economic viability of the process. This study aims to reduce utility energy demand through modifications in the feed preheating stage. The modification involved installing heat exchangers in the stream supplying the main heater and utilizing the recycle stream as an internal heat source. Simulation results demonstrated a significant reduction in the heating load of the main heater, thereby lowering steam demand compared with the original design. Overall, the total heat load decreased by 102,015.82 kJ/h, equivalent to approximately 22.27% relative to baseline conditions. These findings confirm that simple heat integration in the preheating stage can substantially enhance energy efficiency without compromising process performance. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Keywords: Energy efficiency; Acetic Acid; Methanol; Reducing Energy; process design

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Process Optimization of Hydrogen Production via the Water–Gas Shift Reaction Using CO Recycle and Exothermic Reactor Operation Optimizing of Temperature and Pressure in a Modified Plug Flow Reactor to Enhance Benzene Conversion with Process Simulation Software Optimizing Hydrogenation Production via Recycle Loop in Aspen HYSYS Simulated Water Gas Shift Reaction: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis More recent articles
  1. Salma, A.F., Ramadhan, G., Maharani, N.Y., Fatimah, R.S. (2025). Optimization of acetic acid production process using the Cativa method for increasing product purity. Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress, 2(1), 103–114. DOI: 10.9767/jcerp.20320
  2. Vidra, A., Németh, Á. (2018). Bio-produced acetic acid: A review. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering, 62(3), 245–256. DOI: 10.3311/PPch.11004
  3. Yan, Q. (2024). A review of process of methanol carbonylation to produce acetic acid. Applied and Computational Engineering, 61(1), 216–221. DOI: 10.54254/2755-2721/61/20240959
  4. Pacheco, M., Perrière, B.A., Moura, P., Silva, C. (2025). Industrial off-gas fermentation for acetic acid production: A carbon footprint assessment in the context of energy transition. Journal of Carbon Research, 11(3), 1-24. DOI: 10.3390/c11030054
  5. Yehya, R., Sharaf, A.N., Riachi, B., Assaf, J.C., Hamd, W. (2025). A novel integrated simulation approach for natural gas sweetening and dehydration: H₂S, CO₂, and H₂O removal with energy optimization using Aspen HYSYS. Results in Engineering, 28, 107972. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107972
  6. Dimian, A.C., Kiss, A.A. (2020). Novel energy efficient process for acetic acid production by methanol carbonylation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 159, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.04.013
  7. Espejo, J. L., Loe, J., Odriozola, J.A., Reina, T.R., Pérez, L. (2022). Sustainable routes for acetic acid production: Traditional processes vs a low-carbon, biogas-based strategy. Science of the Total Environment, 840, 1-16, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156663
  8. Maiuf, A., Ramadan, N. (2024). The acetic acid production by modeling oxidation of ethylene with Aspen Plus. Surman Journal for Science and Technology, 6(2), 139–149. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.111139
  9. Al-Jammali, A.S.I. (2022). Study the effect of the main variables on the objectives of the natural gas dehydration plant by ASPEN-HYSYS v8.8. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, 12(2), 47–63. DOI: 10.52716/jprs.v12i2.65
  10. Huang, H., Li, X., Yuan, Z., Wu, T., Ye, W., Deng, W., Liu, J. (2025). Energy consumption analysis and optimization of LNG terminals based on Aspen HYSYS dynamic simulation. Processes, 13(9). DOI: 10.3390/pr1309296
  11. Sultana, S.T., Amin, M.R. (2011). Aspen HYSYS simulation of sulfuric acid plant. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 26(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.264041530
  12. Ningsih, E., Albanna, I., Witari, A.P., Anggraini, G.L. (2022). Performance simulation on the shell and tube of heat exchanger by Aspen HYSYS V.10. Rekayasa Mesin, 13(3), 701–706. DOI: 10.21776/jrm.v13i3.1078
  13. Lee, J.Y., Chen, P.Y. (2023). Optimization of heat recovery networks for energy savings in industrial processes. Processes, 11(2), 321. DOI: 10.3390/pr1102032
  14. Smith, J.M., Van Ness, H.C., Abbott, M.M., Swihart, M.T. (2018). Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics. 8th Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill
  15. Kalck, P., Berre, B.C., Serp, P. (2020). Recent advances in the methanol carbonylation reaction into acetic acid. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 402, 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213078

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.