skip to main content

Heat Integration Strategies for Acetaldehyde Production: Optimizing Ethanol Dehydrogenation and Hydrogen Recovery

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 12 Dec 2025; Revised: 16 Dec 2025; Accepted: 17 Dec 2025; Available online: 28 Dec 2025; Published: 30 Dec 2025.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

Acetaldehyde production via ethanol dehydrogenation is inherently energy-intensive due to its endothermic characteristics, while the hydrogen generated as a co-product must achieve high purity to meet industrial specifications. Enhancing energy efficiency and hydrogen quality is therefore essential to advancing the sustainability and economic feasibility of this process. This study investigates strategies to optimize energy consumption and hydrogen purity in acetaldehyde production through systematic heat integration and absorber operating condition optimization. Process simulations were employed to quantify the influence of internal heat exchanger integration on overall heat demand and to examine the effect of absorbent flow rate variation on hydrogen purification performance. Integration of heat exchangers reduced total energy consumption by "10,148,446.64" kJ/h, corresponding to a 23% improvement in energy efficiency. Moreover, increasing the absorber water flow rate elevated hydrogen purity from 94.6% to 99.5%. The combined optimization decreased specific energy consumption to 34,316,959.07 kJ/h and lowered monthly operating costs by 22.8%. These findings demonstrate that coupling heat integration with absorber flow rate optimization constitutes an effective approach to improving energy efficiency, hydrogen quality, and economic viability in acetaldehyde production via ethanol dehydrogenation. Copyright © 2025 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Keywords: Acetaldehyde, Ethanol Dehydrogenation, Heat Integration, Heat Exchanger, Aspen HYSYS.

Article Metrics:

  1. Wenzel, M., Akin, A.N., Dumitrescu, L., Müller, C.R. (2022). Production of acetaldehyde via oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol in a chemical looping setup. ACS Engineering Au, 3(2), 107-116. DOI: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.2c00052
  2. Turton, R., Bailie, R.C., Whiting, W.B., Shaeiwitz, J.A., Bhattacharyya, D. (2018). Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (5th ed.). Pearson Education
  3. Garbarino, G., Pampararo, G., Riani, P., Santori, A., Busca, G. (2022). Acetaldehyde production by ethanol dehydrogenation over Cu-ZnAl₂O₄: Effect of catalyst synthetic strategies on performances. Chemical Engineering Science, 261, 117937. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.117937
  4. Khzouz, M., Gkanas, E.I. (2021). Ethanol decomposition and dehydrogenation for hydrogen production: A review of heterogeneous catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(46), 16561-16576. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02557
  5. Fawwaz, A., Nugraha, A.P.A., Al Rasyid, M. P., Muhammad, R.H. (2025). Minimization of energy consumption through improving purity of hydrogen by-product and adding heat exchanger on acetaldehyde production process. Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress, 2(1), 115-121. DOI: 10.9767/jcerp.20301
  6. Van de Graaf, S., Oosterbroek, R., Schouten, J.C., Neira d'Angelo, M.F. (2023). Promoted hydrogen and acetaldehyde production from alcohol dehydrogenation enabled by electrochemical hydrogen pumps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(14), e2300625120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2300625120
  7. Kinanti, A.A., Febrianti, H.L., Dewi, N.P.S.M. (2024). Enhancing Energy Efficiency and Ethanol Conversion through the Addition of a Heat Exchanger and Reactor in the Catalytic Dehydration Process for Ethylene Production from Ethanol. Journal of Chemical Engineering Research Progress, 1(2), 108-113. DOI: 10.9767/jcerp.20166
  8. Wang, H., Ko, B., O'Donnell-Sloan, J., Vekeman, J., De Vos, D., Comas-Vives, A., Copéret, C. (2024). Efficient conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde with induction heating at low temperature. Chemical Engineering Journal, 495, 153437. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.153437
  9. Foo, D. (Ed.). (2022). Chemical Engineering Process Simulation. Elsevier
  10. Nurhaliza, A., Nandiyanto, A.B.D. (2024). Designing of a Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger for Methyl Chloride Production. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Natural Sciences, 6(1), 50-57. DOI: 10.46923/ijets.v6i1.310
  11. Rao, R.V., Saroj, A., Ocloń, P., Taler, J. (2020). Design Optimization of Heat Exchangers with Advanced Optimization Techniques: A Review: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27(2), 517-548. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-019-09318-y
  12. Caballero, J.A., Pavão, L.V., Costa, C.B., Ravagnani, M. A. (2021). A novel sequential approach for the design of heat exchanger networks. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 3, 733186. DOI: 10.3389/fceng.2021.733186
  13. Pranolo, S.H., Muzayanha, S.U., Yudha, C.S., Hasanah, L.M., Shohih, E.N. (2018). Kajian Konsumsi Energi Spesifik Sektor Industri Kimia Di Indonesia Sebagai Acuan Efisiensi Energi. Prosiding SNTK Eco-SMART, 1(1)
  14. Geankoplis, C.J., Hersel, A.A., Lepek, D.H. (2018). Transport processes and separation process principles, (5th ed.). Prentice Hall
  15. Speight, J.G., 2019. Handbook of Petrochemical Processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton
  16. Chauvel, A., Lefebvre, G., 1989. Petrochemical Processes: Technical and Economic Characteristics Volume 2. Editions Technip, Paris
  17. Ob-eye, J., Praserthdam, P., Jongsomjit, B. (2019). Dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde over different metals supported on carbon catalysts. Catalysts, 9(1), 66. DOI: 10.3390/catal9010066
  18. Klinthongchai, Y., Prichanont, S., Praserthdam, P., Jongsomjit, B. (2021). Study of deactivation in mesocellular foam carbon (MCF-C) catalyst used in gas-phase dehydrogenation of ethanol. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 11683. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91190-7
  19. Abdulrazzaq, H.T., Rahmani Chokanlu, A., Frederick, B.G., Schwartz, T.J. (2020). Reaction kinetics analysis of ethanol dehydrogenation catalyzed by MgO–SiO2. ACS Catalysis, 10(11), 6318-6331. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00811
  20. Mursics, J., Urbancl, D., Goricanec, D. (2020). Process of formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds’ removal from waste gases. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4702. DOI: 10.3390/app10144702
  21. Gupta, A., Armatis, P.D., Sabharwall, P., Fronk, B.M., Utgikar, V. (2021). Thermodynamics of Ca(OH)2/CaO reversible reaction: Refinement of reaction equilibrium and implications for operation of chemical heat pump. Chemical Engineering Science, 230, 116227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116227
  22. dos Santos Junior, J.M., Daltro de Freitas, A.C., Mariano, A.P. (2025). A Python-Based Thermodynamic Equilibrium Library for Gibbs Energy Minimization: A Case Study on Supercritical Water Gasification of Ethanol and Methanol. Eng, 6(9), 208. DOI: 10.3390/eng6090208
  23. Yaws, C.L. 1999. Chemical Properties Handbook. Mc Graw Hill Handbooks. New York
  24. Kartohardjono, S., Paramitha, A., Putri, A.A., Andriant, R. (2017). Effects of Absorbent Flow Rate on CO2 Absorption through a Super Hydrophobic Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactor. International Journal of Technology, 8(8), 1429. DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v8i8.679
  25. Arriola-Medellín, A.M., López-Cisneros, L.F., Aragón-Aguilar, A., Romo-Millares, C.A., Fernández-Montiel, M.F. (2019). Energy efficiency to increase production and quality of products in industrial processes: case study oil and gas processing center. Energy Efficiency, 12(6), 1619-1634. DOI: 10.1007/s12053-019-09803-0

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.