skip to main content

Optimizing of Temperature and Pressure in a Modified Plug Flow Reactor to Enhance Benzene Conversion with Process Simulation Software

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 10 Dec 2025; Revised: 19 Dec 2025; Accepted: 21 Dec 2025; Available online: 8 Jan 2026; Published: 30 Jun 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The increase in industrial dependence on benzene demands a more efficient, high-conversion hydrodealkylation (HDA) process. The HDA of toluene is highly sensitive to temperature and pressure, and inaccuracies in operating conditions can cause side reactions and accelerate catalyst deactivation. This study determined optimal temperature–pressure conditions in a plug flow reactor through steady-state Aspen HYSYS simulation using the Peng–Robinson model and parameter interaction analysis in Design Expert. The results showed a synergistic effect, with temperature as the dominant factor and pressure enhancing conversion. Optimal conditions of 710.8 °C and 67.6 atm produced 90.39% conversion, while the lowest conditions resulted in < 5%. These findings confirm that precise control of operating parameters improves reactor performance and hydrogen utilization, supporting a more stable and energy-efficient HDA process. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Supporting Information (SI) PDF
Keywords: Process Optimization; Plug Flow Reactor; Benzene; Process Simulation Software

Article Metrics:

  1. Miller, D., Armstrong, K., Styring, P. (2022). Assessing methods for the production of renewable benzene. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 184-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.019
  2. Chang, F., Fedorov, A. (2023). Production of benzene by the hydrodemethylation of toluene with carbon‐supported potassium hydride. ChemSusChem, 16(2), e202202029. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202202029
  3. Wang, D., Wei, X., Shou, S., Gong, J. (2023). Dealkylation in Fluid Catalytic Cracking Condition for Efficient Conversion of Heavy Aromatics to Benzene–Toluene–Xylene. ACS Omega, 8(12), 10789-10795. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06507
  4. Cortazar, M., Alvarez, J., Olazar, L., Santamaria, L., Lopez, G., Villafan-Vidales, H.I., Asuesta, A., Olazar, M. (2022). Activity and stability of different Fe loaded primary catalysts for tar elimination. Fuel, 317, 123457. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123457
  5. Xing, L., Liu, S., & Ross, Y. (2022). Production of Benzene by Hydrodealkylation of Toluene. California: University of California Santa Barbara
  6. Rani, J., Thakur, P., Majumder, S. (2024). Energy integration of hydrodealkylation (HDA) of toluene. Materials Today: Proceedings, 111, 60-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.11.044
  7. Babaqi, B.S., Takriff, M.S., Othman, N.T.A., Kamarudin, S.K. (2020). Yield and energy optimization of the continuous catalytic regeneration reforming process based particle swarm optimization. Energy, 206, 118098. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118098
  8. Pham, P.T., Pham, C.Q., Dam, T.T., Nguyen, Q.A., Nguyen, T.M. (2025). A comprehensive review of catalyst deactivation and regeneration in heavy oil hydroprocessing. Fuel Processing Technology, 267, 108170. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2024.108170
  9. Daligaux, V., Richard, R., Marin-Gallego, M., Ruaux, V., Pinard, L., Manero, M.H. (2024). Deactivation by coking of industrial ZSM-5 catalysts used in LDPE pyroysis and regeneration by ozonation process–Bench scale studies. Applied Catalysis A: General, 671, 119581. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2024.119581
  10. Frede, T.A., Nikbin, N., Kockmann, N. (2023). Reactor performance estimation in microscale flow calorimeter for rapid characterization of exothermic reactions. Journal of Flow Chemistry, 13(1), 31-44. DOI: 10.1007/s41981-022-00251-z
  11. Williams, J.D., Sagmeister, P., Kappe, C.O. (2024). Dynamic flow experiments for data-rich optimization. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 47, 100921. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100921
  12. Agustriyanto, R., Setyopratomo, P., Mochni, E.S., Purwanto, E. (2024). Simulation of the hydrodealkylation of toulene using conversion reactor. Keluwih: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 5(1), 19-26. DOI: 10.24123/saintek.v5i1.6351
  13. Fogler, H.S. (2020). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (6th ed.). Pearson Education
  14. Ali, M.A., Haji, S., Al-Khayyat, M., Abutaleb, A., Ahmed, S. (2022). Kinetic modeling and thermodynamic analysis of toluene disproportionation reaction over ZSM-5 based catalysts. Catalysis Communications, 172, 106541. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2022.106541
  15. Levenspiel, O. (1999). Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed.)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.