skip to main content

Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oil over Plasma Reactor: Optimization of Biodiesel Yield using Response Surface Methodology

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. H. Sudarto, SH., Semarang, Indonesia

2Department of Physics, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Kampus Sekaran Gunung Pati, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 10 Aug 2009; Revised: 5 Sep 2009; Accepted: 12 Oct 2009; Published: 20 Oct 2009.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2009 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Abstract
Biodiesel production has received considerable attention in the recent past as a renewable fuel. The production of biodiesel by conventional transesterification process employs alkali or acid catalyst and has been industrially accepted for its high conversion and reaction rates. However for alkali catalyst, there may be risk of free acid or water contamination and soap formation is likely to take place which makes the separation process difficult. Although yield is high, the acids, being corrosive, may cause damage to the equipment and the reaction rate was also observed to be low. This research focuses on empirical modeling and optimization for the biodiesel production over plasma reactor. The plasma reactor technology is more promising than the conventional catalytic processes due to the reducing reaction time and easy in product separation. © 2009 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)
Keywords: biodiesel; plasma reactor; optimization; response surface methodology; central composite design
Funding: Directorate General of Higher Education of Republic of Indonesia under contract HIBAH BERSAING GRANT YEAR 2008

Article Metrics:

  1. Ma, F., Hanna, M.A. 1999, Bioresour. Technol., 70: 1–15
  2. Ranganathan, S.V., Narasimhan, S.L., Muthukumar, K. 2008, Bioresource Technology, 99: 3975–3981
  3. Marchetti, J.M., Miguel, V.U., Errazu, A.F. 2006, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11:1300-1311
  4. Meher, L.C., Sagar, D.V., Naik, S.N. 2006, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10:248–268
  5. Fukuda, H., Kondo, A., Noda, H. 2001, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 92:405–416
  6. Leung, D.Y.C., Guo, Y. 2006, Fuel Proc. Technol., 87: 883-890
  7. Istadi and Amin, N.A.S. 2006, Fuel, 85: 577-592
  8. Lieberman, M.A. and Lichtenberg, A.J. Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994
  9. D.C. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001
  10. Cornell, J.A. How to Apply Response Surface Methodology, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality Control, 1990
  11. Istadi and Amin, N.A.S. 2006, Fuel Proc. Technol., 87: 449-459
  12. Knothe, G., Gerpen, J.V., Krahl, J. The Biodiesel Handbook, Illinois: AOCS Press, 2005
  13. Mahajan, S., Konar, S.K., and Boocock, D.G.B., 2006, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 83: 567–570
  14. Wang, H., Tang, H., Wilson, J., Salley, S.O., Simon , K. Y., 2008, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 85:1083–1086

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.