skip to main content

Variability of Energy Dissipation and Shear Rate with Geometry in Unbaffled Surface Aerator

Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India

Received: 17 Oct 2009; Revised: 12 Dec 2009; Accepted: 20 Dec 2009; Published: 30 Dec 2009.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2009 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Abstract
The dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy () and shear rate (γ) are the key process parameters for mixing in surface aerators. At constant dynamic variables (rotational speed), both  and γ are greatly affected by the geometric parameters (impeller diameter, cross-sectional area of the tank, liquid height, rotor blade length and immersion height). By doing numerical computation by VISIMIX ®, present work analyzes the effect of non-dimensional (which is non-dimensionalized through rotor diameter) geometric parameters on e and g. With an increase in liquid height, there is an increase in the case of energy dissipation and shear rate values. In the case of tank area and blade length, it is vice versa. Energy dissipation and shear rate are not affected by the variation in immersion height of the impeller. 
Keywords: Energy dissipation; mixing; shear rate; surface aerator

Article Metrics:

  1. Fair, G., Gayer, J., and Okum, D. 1971. Elements of water supply and waste water disposal, John Wiley and Sons, New York
  2. McWhirter, J., Chern, J., and Hutter, J. 1995. Oxygen Mass Transfer Fundamentals of Surface Aerators. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34:2644-2654
  3. Rao, A., and Kumar, B. 2008. Scaling-Up the Geometrically Similar Unbaffled Circular Tank Surface Aerator. Chemical Engineering and Technology 31: 287-293
  4. Grisafi, F., Brucato, A., and Rizzuti, L. 1994, Solid liquid mass transfer coefficients in mixing tanks: influence of side wall roughness. Instn Chem. Engn Symp. Ser. 136: 571-578
  5. Nagata, S. 1975. Mixing Principles and applications. John-Wiley & Sons
  6. Johnson, A., and Huang, C. 1956. Mass transfer studies in an agitated vessel. AIChE J. 2: 412-419
  7. Yianneskis, M., and Whitelaw, J. 1993. On the structure of the trailing vortices around Rushton turbine blades. Trans IChemE. 71: 543-550
  8. Schaffer, M., Hofken, M., and Durst, F. 1997. Detailed LDV Measurements for Visualization of the Flow Field Within a Stirred-Tank Reactor Equipped with a Rushton Turbine. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 75: 729-736
  9. Yianneskis, M., Popiolek, Z., and Whitelaw, J. 1987. An Experimental Study of the Steady and Unsteady Flow Characteristics of Stirred Reactors. J. Fluid Mech. 175: 537-555
  10. Kumar, B., and Rao, A. 2009. Oxygen transfer and energy dissipation rate in surface aerator. Bioresource Technology 100: 2886-2888
  11. Gjaltema, A., Tijhuis, L., van Loosdrecht, M., and Heijnen, J. 1995. Detachment of biomass from suspended non-growing spherical biofilms in airlift bioreactors. Biotech. Bioeng 46:258-269
  12. Gjaltema, A., van der Marel, N., van Loosdrecht, M., and Heijnen, J. 1997. Adhesion and biofilm development on suspended carriers in airlift reactors: Hydrodynamic conditions versus surface characteristics. Biotech. Bioeng. 55: 880-889
  13. Leenen, E., Martins dos Santos, V., Grolle, K., Tramper, K.J., and Wijffels, R. 1996. Characterization and Selection Criteria of Support Materials for Cell Immobilization. Water Res 30: 2895-2996
  14. Martins dos Santos, V., Leenen, E., Rippoll, M., van der Sluis, C., Vliet, T., Tramper, J., and R. Wijffels, R. 1997. Relevance of the Rheological Properties of Gel Beads for their Mechanical Stability in Bioreactors. Biotech. Bioeng, 56: 217-229
  15. Pope, S.B. 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  16. Saarentine, P., and Piirto, M. 2000. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from PIV Velocity Vectors Fields. Exp. Fluids 29: 300-307
  17. Cutter, L. 1966. Flow and Turbulence in a Stirred Tank. AIChE J. 12: 35-44
  18. Wu, H., and Patterson, G. 1989. Laser-Doppler Measurements of Turbulent Flow Parameters in a Stirred Mixer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 44:2207-2221
  19. Zhou, G., and Kresta, S. 1996a. Distribution of Energy Between Convective and Turbulent Flow for Three Frequently Used Impellers. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 74: 379-389
  20. Okamota, Y., Nishikawa, M., and Hashimoto, K. 1981. Energy Dissipation Rate Distribution in Mixing Vessels and Its Effects on Liquid- Liquid Dispersions and Solid-Liquid Mass Transfer. Int. Chem. Eng. 21: 88-94
  21. Costes, J., and Couderc, J. 1988. Influence of the Size of the Units: I. Mean Flow and Turbulence. Chem. Eng. Sci., 43: 2751-2764
  22. Zhou, G., and Kresta, S. 1996b. Impact of the Geometry on the Maximum Turbulence Energy Dissipation Rate for Impellers. AIChE J. 42: 2476-2490
  23. Liu, K., and Neeld, K. 1999, Topical Conference on Process Development from Research to Manufacturing: Industrial Mixing and Scale-up, AICHE Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX.
  24. Genck, W. 2003. Optimizing crystallizer scale up. Chem Eng Prog. 99: 36-44
  25. Kresta, S., and Wood, P. 1993. The Flow Field Produced by a 45ø Pitched Blade Turbine: Characterization of the Turbulence and Estimation of the Dissipation Rate. Chem Eng Sci. 48: 1761-1774
  26. Pe´rez, J., Porcel, E., Lo´pez, J., Sevilla, J., and Chisti, Y. 2006. Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors. Chem Eng J. 124: 1-5
  27. Metzner, A., and Otto, R. 1957. Agitation of non-Newtonian fluids. AIChE J. 3, 3-10
  28. Rao A. 1999. Prediction of reaeration rates in square, stirred tanks. Journal of Environmental Engineering 125: 215-233

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.