skip to main content

Optimization of Reactor Temperature and Catalyst Weight for Plastic Cracking to Fuels Using Response Surface Methodology

Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, Kampus UNDIP Tembalang, Semarang 50239, Indonesia

Received: 10 Jul 2010; Revised: 18 Sep 2010; Accepted: 19 Sep 2010; Published: 20 Dec 2010.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2010 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Abstract
The present study deals with effect of reactor temperature and catalyst weight on performance of plastic waste cracking to fuels over modified catalyst waste as well as their optimization. From optimization study, the most operating parameters affected the performance of the catalytic cracking process is reactor temperature followed by catalyst weight. Increasing the reactor temperature improves significantly the cracking performance due to the increasing catalyst activity. The optimal operating conditions of reactor temperature about 550 oC and catalyst weight about 1.25 gram were produced with respect to maximum liquid fuel product yield of 29.67 %. The liquid fuel product consists of gasoline range hydrocarbons (C4-C13) with favorable heating value (44,768 kJ/kg). © 2010 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)
Keywords: plastic waste; Residual Catalytic Cracking; optimization; central composite design; response surface methodology
Funding: Directorate General for Higher Education (DIKTI) Republic of Indonesia under contract HIBAH KOMPETENSI GRANT YEAR 2010

Article Metrics:

  1. T.J. Appleton, R.I. Colder, S.W. Kingman, I.S. Lowndes, A.G. Read. (2005). Applied Energy, 81, 85-11
  2. B. V. Babu, A. S. Chaurasia, (2003). Energy Conversion Management, 44, 2135-2158
  3. H. Huang, L. Tang, (2007). Energy Conversion Management, 48, 1331-1337
  4. G. Manos, A. Garforth, J. Dwyer, (2000). Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 39, 1198-1202
  5. A.R. Songip, T. Masuda, H. Kuwahara, K. Hashimoto. (1993). Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2, 153-164
  6. Y. Ishihara, H. Nanbu, T. Ikemura, T. Takesue, (1990). Fuel, 69, 978-984
  7. Y. Sakata, M.A. Uddin, A. Muto, (1999). Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 51, 135-155
  8. Y. Uemichi, Y. Kashiwaya, M. Tsukidate, A. Ayame, H. Kanoh, (1983). Bulletin of Chemical Society of Japan, 56, 2768-2773
  9. Y.H. Lin, M.H. Yang, (2005), Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 231, 113-122
  10. Y. Uemichi, J. Nakamura, T. Itoh, M. Sugioka, (1999). Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 38, 385-390
  11. A. Marcilla, A. Gomez-Siurana, F. Valdes, (2008). Microporous Mesoporous Materials, 109, 420-428
  12. A. Marcilla, A. Gomez.Siurana, F. Valdes, (2007). Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 79, 433-442
  13. S. Ali, A.A. Garforth, D.H. Harris, D.J. Rawlence, Y. Uemichi, (2002). Catalysis Today, 75, 247-255
  14. S.C. Cardona, A. Corma, (2000). Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 25, 151-162
  15. N.S. Akpanudoh, K. Gobin, G. Manos, (2005). Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 235, 67-73
  16. G. De la Puente, C. Klocker, U. Sedran, (2002). Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 36, 279-285
  17. G. De la Puente, J.M. Arandes, U.A. Sedran, (1997). Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 36, 4530-4534
  18. D.P. Serrano, J. Aguado, J.M. Escola, (2000). Industrial Engineerng Chemistry Research, 39, 1177-1184
  19. J. Aguado, J.L. Sotelo, D.P. Serrano, J.A. Calles, J.M. Escola, (1997). Energy Fuels, 11, 1225-1231
  20. D.P. Serrano, J. Aguado, J.M. Escola, (2000), Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 25, 181-189
  21. D.C. Montgomery, (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  22. G.M. Clarke, R.E. Kempson, (1997). Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Experiments, Arnold, London
  23. J.A. Cornell, (1990). How to Apply Response Surface Methodology, American Society for Quality Control, Wisconsin
  24. G.E.P. Box, W.G. Hunter, J.S. Hunter, (1978). Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  25. Ji-lu Zheng, Xi-feng Zhu, Qing-xiang Guo, Qing-shi Zhu. (2006). Waste Management. 26, 1430-1435
  26. P. Thipkhunthod, V. Meeyoo, P. Rangsunvigit, B. Kitiyanan, K. Siemanond and T. Rirksomboon. (2005). Fuel, 84, 849-857
  27. J. Aguado, D.P. Serrano, G. San Miguel, (2007). Journal of Polymer & Environment, 15, 107-118
  28. W. L. Yoona, J. S. Parka, H. Junga, H. T. Leea, D. K. Leeb. (1999). Fuel. 78, 809–813

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.