skip to main content

Pressure Drop Hysteresis of Hydrodynamic States in Packed Tower for Foaming Systems

1Department of Chemical and Biotechnology Engineering, Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur, Punjab 143521, India

2Department of Chemical Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144011, India

Received: 14 Mar 2011; Revised: 29 Jun 2011; Accepted: 4 Jul 2011; Published: 20 Dec 2011.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2011 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Abstract
An experimental investigation was carried out to determine the effects of gas and liquid flow velocities and surface tension on the two-phase phase pressure drop a in a downflow trickle bed reactor. Water and non- Newtonian foaming solutions were employed as liquid phase. More than 240 experimental points for the trickle flow (GCF) and foaming pulsing flow (PF/FPF) regime were obtained for present study. Hydrodynamic characteristics involving two-phase pressure drop significantly influenced by gas and liquid flow rates. For 15 and 30 ppm air-aqueous surfactant solutions, two-phase pressure drop increases with higher liquid and gas flow velocities in trickle flow and foaming/pulsing flow regimes. With decrease in surface tension i.e. for 45 and 60 ppm air-aqueous surfactant systems, two-phase pressure drop increases very sharply during change in regime transition at significantly low liquid and gas velocities. © 2011 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)
Keywords: Trickle Bed Reactor; Foaming; Hydrodynamics; Pressure Drop

Article Metrics:

  1. Burghardt, A.; Bartelmus, G.; Szlemp, A. 1995. Hydrodynamics of pulsing flow in three-phase fixed-bed reactor operating at an elevated pressure, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 43: 4511–4521
  2. Bansal, Ajay, 2003. Hydrodynamics of trickle bed reactor, Ph.d Thesis. Engineering and Technology Faculty, Punjab University, Patiala, Punjab, India
  3. Bansal, A.; Wanchoo, R. K.; and Sharma, S. K. 2008. Flow regime transition in a trickle bed reactor, Chemical Engineering Communication 58:111-118
  4. Prud’homme. R.K.; Khan, S.A. ‘Foams, Theory, Measurements, and Applications’, CRC Press, 1996
  5. Midoux, N.; Favier, M.; Charpentier, J.C. 1976. Flow pattern, Pressure Loss and Liquid Holdup Data in Gas–Liquid Downflow Packed Beds with Foaming and Non-foaming Hydrocarbons, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 9: 350–356
  6. Saroha, A.K.; Nigam, K.D.P. 1996. Trickle bed reactors, Reviews in Chemical Engineering 12: 207–347
  7. Grandjean, B. P. A.; Iliuta, I.; Larachi, F. 2002. New mechanistic model for pressure drop and liquid holdup in trickle flow reactors, Chemical Engineering Science 57: 3359 – 3371
  8. Muthanna, A.; Dudukovic, M. 1995. Pressure drop and liquid holdup in high pressure trickle bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 49: 5681–5698
  9. Iliuta, I.; Thyrion, F.C.; Muntean, O. 1996. Residence time distribution of the liquid in two-phase cocurrent downflow in packed beds: air/Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquid systems, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74: 783-796
  10. Sai, P.S.T.; Varma, Y.B.G. 1987. Pressure drop in gas–liquid downflow through packed beds, American Institute of Chemical Engineering. Journal 33: 2027–2035
  11. Larachi, F.; Laurent, A.; Midoux, N.; Wild, G. 1991. Experimental study of a trickle bed reactor operating at high pressure: two-phase pressure drop and liquid saturation. Chemical Engineering Science 46: 1233–1246
  12. Aydin, B.; Larachi, F. 2008. Trickle bed hydrodynamics for (non-)Newtonian foaming liquids in non-ambient conditions, Chemical Engineering Journal 143: 236–243
  13. Wang, R.; Zai-sha, M.; and Jiayong, C. 1995. Experimental and Theoretical Studies on Pressure Drop Hysteresis in Trickle Bed Reactors, Chemical Engineering Science, 50(14): 2321-2328
  14. Bartelmus, G.; Janecki, D. 2004. Hydrodynamics of the cocurrent downflow of a gas and a foaming liquid through a packed bed. Part I. Estimation of the transition boundary between the hydrodynamic regimes from the gas continuous flow to the pulsing flow, Chemical Engineering and Processing 43: 169–179
  15. Bartelmus G.; Janecki, D. 2003. Hydrodynamics of a cocurrent downflow of gas and foaming liquid through the packed bed. Part II. Liquid holdup and gas pressure drop, Chemical Engineering Processing 42: 993–1005
  16. Charpentier, J. C.; and Favier, M. 1975. Some liquid holdup experimental data in trickle-bed reactors for foaming and non-foaming hydrocarbons. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal 21: 1213-1218
  17. Szlemp, D.; Janecki, A.; and Bartelmus, G. 2001. Hydrodynamics of a co-current three-phase solid-bed reactor for foaming systems, Chemical Engineering Science 56: 1111-1116
  18. Aydin, B.; Larachi, F. 2008. Trickle bed hydrodynamics for non-Newtonian foaming liquids in non-ambient conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal 143: 236-243
  19. Gupta, R; and Bansal, A. 2010. Hydrodynamic Studies on a Trickle Bed Reactor for Foaming Liquids. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 5 (1): 31 – 37

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.