skip to main content

The Incorporation of Hemin Catalysts and Alumina Nanoparticles in a Medium of Spondias mombin Leaf Extract of A Sulfonated Polysulfone-Polyaniline_Alumina Membrane Electrode Assembly for Fuel Cell Technologies

1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia

2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

3Research Center of Energy Materials National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) , Tangerang Selatan 15314, Indonesia

Received: 10 Jan 2026; Revised: 5 May 2026; Accepted: 16 May 2026; Available online: 21 Jun 2026; Published: 30 Oct 2026.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by Authors, Published by BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The development of sustainable Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA) is crucial for advancing fuel cell technology. This study presents a novel MEA design that incorporates metal oxide nanoparticles synthesized using natural materials into a high-performance membrane and employs a non-platinum catalyst. Specifically, alumina (Al2O3) nanoparticles were synthesized in medium Spondias mombin leaf extract, which served as both a base source and a capping agent. Alumina nanoparticles combined with polyaniline serve as a composite material to enhance the hydrophilicity, structural and thermal stability, power density, and proton conductivity of a sulfonated polysulfone-based composite membrane. Alumina is known as a catalyst support with a large surface area, while polyaniline is a conductive polymer that readily interacts with metal oxides and hemin, which is rich in electrons, exhibits catalytic activity. Based on the characterization of physical and chemical properties, the SPSU-PANI_Al2O3 7.5% composite MEA using a hemin catalyst on the cathode in a fuel cell (DMFC) demonstrated good structural and thermal stability, low methanol permeabilitity (3.37×10-6 cm2/s), and high-power density (90.76 mW/cm2), but low proton conductivity. Furthermore, Electrochemical cell testing of the hemin catalyst, which identified two reduction peaks at 0.48-0.52 V and 1.22 V similar to those of the Pt catalyst at the cathode demonstrates that the hemin catalyst provides comparable cell potential and catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction for fuel cell technologies. Copyright © 2026 by Authors, Published by BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

Keywords: Fuel Cell; Green-Synthesized Alumina Nanoparticles; Hemin Catalyst; Membrane Electrode Assembly
Funding: Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia under contract SKU-137/UN2.R3/HKP.05/2022

Article Metrics:

  1. Sigwadi, R., Mokrani, T., Dhlamini, M.S., Nonjola, P., Msomi, P.F. (2019). Nafion®/ sulfated zirconia oxide-nanocomposite membrane: the effects of ammonia sulfate on fuel permeability. Journal of Polymer Research, 26(5). DOI: 10.1007/s10965-019-1760-2
  2. Baker, A.M., Wang, L., Johnson, W.B., Prasad, A.K., Advani, S.G. (2014). Nafion membranes reinforced with ceria-coated multiwall carbon nanotubes for improved mechanical and chemical durability in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 118(46), 26796–26802. DOI: 10.1021/jp5078399
  3. Lufrano, F., Baglio, V., Di Blasi, O., Staiti, P., Antonucci, V., Aricò, A.S. (2012). Solid polymer electrolyte based on sulfonated polysulfone membranes and acidic silica for direct methanol fuel cells. Solid State Ionics, 216, 90–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.03.015
  4. Padmavathi, R., Karthikumar, R., Sangeetha, D. (2012). Multilayered sulphonated polysulfone/silica composite membranes for fuel cell applications. Electrochimica Acta, 71, 283–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.015
  5. Maharana, T., Sutar, A.K., Nath, N., Routaray, A., Negi, Y.S., Mohanty, B. (2014). Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Membrane for Fuel Cell Applications. In: Advanced Energy Materials. Wiley, pp. 433–464. DOI: 10.1002/9781118904923.ch11
  6. Mulijani, S., Dahlan, K., Wulanawati, A. (2014). Sulfonated Polystyrene Copolymer: Synthesis, Characterization and Its Application of Membrane for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC). International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, 2(1), 36–40. DOI: 10.7763/ijmmm.2014.v2.95
  7. Nagarale, R.K., Gohil, G.S., Shahi, V.K., Rangarajan, R. (2005). Preparation and electrochemical characterization of sulfonated polysulfone cation‐exchange membranes: Effects of the solvents on the degree of sulfonation. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 96(6), 2344–2351. DOI: 10.1002/app.21630
  8. Rehman, M., Zhang, W., Su, H., Zhang, J., Rhimi, B., Liu, H., Xing, L., Yan, X., Xu, Q. (2024). Review article A review of additional modifications of additives through hydrophilic functional groups for the application of proton exchange membranes in fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 622(September), 235353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235353
  9. Njoku, P.C., Akumefula, M.I. (2007). Phytochemical and Nutrient Evaluation of Spondias Mombin Leaves. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 6(6), 613–615. DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2007.613.615
  10. Maria Mahimai, B., Kulasekaran, P., Deivanayagam, P. (2021). Novel polysulfone/sulfonated polyaniline/niobium pentoxide polymer blend nanocomposite membranes for fuel cell applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138(41) DOI: 10.1002/app.51207
  11. Penteado, M.H., Cruz-Cruz, I., Hümmelgen, I.A. (2019). Giant Seebeck coefficient in thin sulfonated polyaniline film based devices. Organic Electronics, 67, 153–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.01.007
  12. Goudarzi, M., Ghanbari, D. (2015). Synthesis and Characterization of Al(OH)3, Al2O3 Nanoparticles and Polymeric Nanocomposites. Journal of Cluster Science, 27(1), 25–38. DOI: 10.1007/s10876-015-0895-5
  13. Alhoshan, M., Alam, J., Dass, L.A., Al‐Homaidi, N. (2013). Fabrication of Polysulfone/ZnO Membrane: Influence of ZnO Nanoparticles on Membrane Characteristics. Advances in Polymer Technology, 32(4). DOI: 10.1002/adv.21369
  14. Proietti, E., Jaouen, F., Lefèvre, M., Larouche, N., Tian, J., Herranz, J., Dodelet, J.-P. (2011). Iron-based cathode catalyst with enhanced power density in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Nature Communications, 2(1), 416. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1427
  15. Maruyama, J., Abe, I. (2007). Fuel Cell Cathode Catalyst with Heme-Like Structure Formed from Nitrogen of Glycine and Iron. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 154(3), B297. DOI: 10.1149/1.2409865
  16. Villagran, Z., Anaya-esparza, L.M., Arnulfo, C., Rodr, E., Mart, F. (2024). Plant-Based Extracts as Reducing , Capping , and Stabilizing Agents for the Green Synthesis of Inorganic Nanoparticles. Resources, 13(70), 1–24. DOI: 10.3390/resources13060070
  17. Lowry, G.V., Hill, R.J., Harper, S., Rawle, A.F., Hendren, C.O., Klaessig, F., Nobbmann, U., Sayre, P., Rumble, J. (2016). Guidance to improve the scientific value of zeta-potential measurements in nanoEHS. Environmental Science: Nano, 3(5), 953–965. DOI: 10.1039/c6en00136j
  18. Wang, X., Sun, T., Zhu, H., Han, T., Wang, J., Dai, H. (2020). Roles of pH , cation valence , and ionic strength in the stability and aggregation behavior of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Environmental Management, 267 (December 2019), 110656. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110656
  19. Kane, S.N., Mishra, A., Dutta, A.K. (2016). Preface: International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics (ICRTP 2016). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1), 8–13. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
  20. Feret, F.R., Roy, D., Boulanger, C. (2000). Determination of alpha and beta alumina in ceramic alumina by X-ray diffraction. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 55(7), 1051–1061. DOI: 10.1016/S0584-8547(00)00225-1
  21. Shen, L., Hu, C., Sakka, Y., Huang, Q. (2012). Study of phase transformation behaviour of alumina through precipitation method. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 45(21), 215302. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/45/21/215302
  22. Wang, G., Kang, J., Yang, S., Lu, M., Wei, H. (2023). Influence of structure construction on water uptake , swelling , and oxidation stability of proton exchange membranes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 50, 279–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.129
  23. Xing, P., Robertson, G.P., Guiver, M.D., Mikhailenko, S.D., Wang, K., Kaliaguine, S. (2004). Synthesis and characterization of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) for proton exchange membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 229(1–2), 95–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.019
  24. Deivanayagam, P., Ramanujam Ramamoorthy, A., Jaisankar, S.N. (2013). Synthesis and characterization of sulfonated poly (arylene ether sulfone)/silicotungstic acid composite membranes for fuel cells. Polymer Journal, 45(2), 166–172. DOI: 10.1038/pj.2012.102
  25. Mallick, R.K., Thombre, S.B., Shrivastava, N.K. (2016). Vapor feed direct methanol fuel cells ( DMFCs ): A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 51–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.039
  26. Ahmed, M., Dincer, I. (2011). Methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells : challenges and achievements. International Journal of Energy Research, (July), 1213–1228. DOI: 10.1002/er.1889
  27. Bayrakceken, A., Erkan, S., Turker, L., Eroglu, I. (2008). Effects of membrane electrode assembly components on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33, 165–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.021
  28. Chen, M., Zhao, C., Sun, F., Fan, J., Li, H., Wang, H. (2020). Research progress of catalyst layer and interlayer interface structures in membrane electrode assembly ( MEA ) for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. eTransportation, 5, 100075. DOI: 10.1016/j.etran.2020.100075
  29. Li, J., Wu, H., Cao, L., He, X., Shi, B., Li, Y., Xu, M. (2019). Enhanced Proton Conductivity of Sulfonated Polysulfone Membranes under Low Humidity via the Incorporation of Multifunctional Graphene Oxide. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2, 4734–4743. DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b00446
  30. Baronia, R., Goel, J., Kaswan, J., Shukla, A., Singhal, S.K., Singh, S.P. (2018). PtCo / rGO nano ‑ anode catalyst : enhanced power density with reduced methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cell. Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 7(27), 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s40243-018-0134-8
  31. Gandhimathi, S., Krishnan, H. (2019). Development of proton-exchange polymer nanocomposite membranes for fuel cell applications. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/0967391119888319
  32. Lufrano, C., Simari, C., Vecchio, C.L., Arico, A.S., Baglio, V., Nicotera, I. (2020). Barrier properties of sulfonated polysulfone / layered double hydroxides nanocomposite membrane for direct methanol fuel cell operating at high methanol concentrations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(40), 20647-20658. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.101
  33. Shangguan, Z., Li, B., Zhang, C. (2021). Understanding the functions and modi fi cations of interfaces in membrane electrode assemblies of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 9, 15111–15139. DOI: 10.1039/d1ta01591e

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.