skip to main content

Fuzzy Modeling to Evaluate the Effect of Temperature on Batch Transesterification of Jatropha Curcas for Biodiesel Production

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Beant College of Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur, Punjab, India

2Department of Bio Technology, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, West Bengal, India

Received: 27 Jan 2011; Revised: 13 Feb 2011; Accepted: 16 Feb 2011; Published: 20 Jun 2011.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2011 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Abstract
Biodiesel is an alternative source of fuel that can be synthesized from edible, non-edible and waste oils through transesterification. Firstly Transesterification reaction of Jatropha Curcas oil with butanol in the ratio of 1:25 investigated by using of sodium hydroxide catalyst with mixing intensity of 250 rpm in isothermal batch reactor. Secondly the fuzzy model of the temperature is developed. Performance was evaluated by comparing fuzzy model with the batch kinetic data. Fuzzy models were developed using adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS). © 2011 by Authors, Published by BCREC Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)
Keywords: Transesterification; Temperature; Jatropha Curcas oil; Chemical Kinetics and Fuzzy Modeling

Article Metrics:

  1. Kalogirou, M.; Pistikopoulos, P.; Ntziachristos, L.; and Samaras, Z. 2009. Isothermal soot oxidation experiments with intermediate gas change in a perkin-elmer TGA6. J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 95: 141–147. doi: 10.1007/s10973-008-9156-2
  2. Lloyd, A.C.; and T.A. Cackette. 2001. Diesel Engines: Environmental Impact and Control. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 51: 809-847. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464315
  3. Walker, A.P. 2004. Controlling particulate emissions from diesel vehicles: A Review. Topics in Catal. 28: 165-170. doi: 10.1023/B:TOCA.0000024346.29600.0e
  4. Stamatelos, A.M. 1997. A review of the effect of particulate traps on the efficiency of vehicle diesel engines. Energy Convers. Mgmt. 38: 83-99. doi: 10.1016/0196-8904(96)00011-8
  5. Fino, D. 2007. Diesel emission control: A review of catalytic filters for particulate removal. Sci. & Technol. of Adv. Materials 8: 93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.stam.2006.11.012
  6. Lopez-Fonseca, R.; Elizundia, U.; Landa, I.; Gutie´rrez-Ortiz, M.A.; Gonza´lez-Velasco, J.R. 2005. Kinetic analysis of non-catalytic and Mncatalysed combustion of diesel soot surrogates. Appl. Catal. B 61: 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.04.016
  7. Van Setten, B.A.A.L.; Schouten, J.M.; Makkee, M.; Moulijn, J.A. 2000. Realistic contact for soot with an oxidation catalyst for laboratory studies. Appl. Catal. B 28: 253-257. doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00182-X
  8. Darcy, P., Da Costa, P., Mellottée, H., Trichard, J.-M., Djéga-Mariadassou, G. (2007). Kinetics of catalyzed and non-catalyzed oxidation of soot from a diesel engine. Catalysis Today, 119 (1-4): 252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.08.056
  9. Stanmore, B.R.; Brilhac, J.F.; Gilot, P. 2001. The oxidation of soot: a review of experiments, mechanisms and models. Carbon 39: 2247–2268. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00109-9
  10. Dernaika, B.; Uner, D. 2003. A simplified approach to determine the activation energies of uncatalyzed and catalyzed combustion of soot. Appl. Catal. B 40: 219-229, doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00152-2
  11. Illekova, E.; and Csomorova, K.2005. Kinetics of oxidation in various forms of carbon. J. Therm. Anal. Cal. 80: 103-108. doi: 10.1007/s10973-005-0620-y
  12. Lopez-Fonseca, R.; Landa, I.; Gutierrez-Ortiz, M. A.; and Gonzalez-Velasco, J. R. 2005. Nonisothermal analysis of the kinetics of the combustion of carbonaceous materials, J. Therm. Anal. Cal.80: 65-69. doi: 10.1007/s10973-005-0614-9
  13. Mianowski, A.; Bigda, R. ; Zymla, V. 2006. Study on kinetics of combustion of brick-shaped carbonaceous materials. J. Therm. Anal.Cal. 84: 563-574. doi: 10.1007/s10973-005-6973-4
  14. Neeft, J.; Hoornaert, F. ; Makkee, M.; and Moulijn, J. A.1996. The effects of heat and mass transfer in thermogravimetrical analysis. A case study towards the catalytic oxidation of soot. Thermochim. Acta, 287: 261-278. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6031(96)03002-X
  15. Stratakis, G. A.; and Stamatelos, A. M. 2003. Thermogravimetric analysis of soot emitted by a modern diesel engine run on catalyst-doped fuel. Combust. Flame. 132: 157-169. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00432-7
  16. Yezerets, A.; Currier, N. W.; and Eadler, H. A. 2003. Experimental Determination of the Kinetics of Diesel Soot Oxidation By OD2 - Modelling Consequences. SAE technical paper, 2003-01-0833
  17. Messerer, A.; Niessner, R.; and Poschl, U. 2006. Comprehensive kinetic characterization of the oxidation and gasification of model and real diesel soot by nitrogen oxides and oxygen under engine exhaust conditions: Measurement, Langmuir-Hinshelwood, and Arrhenius parameters. Carbon 44: 307-324. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.017
  18. Ahlstrom, A. F. and Odenbrand, C. U. I. Combustion characteristics of soot deposits from diesel engines.Carbon 1989, 27, 475-483. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(889)990080-8

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.