skip to main content

Utilization of Heat from The Reactor's Outlet Stream in Formaldehyde Production to Reduce Energy Usage in The Heat Exchanger

Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia

Received: 15 Jun 2024; Revised: 6 Jul 2024; Accepted: 7 Jul 2024; Available online: 9 Jul 2024; Published: 30 Dec 2024.
Editor(s): Istadi Istadi
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Fulltext View|Download

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

Global production of formaldehyde has consistently risen over the past ten years, highlighting its extensive industrial applications and high demand across various sectors worldwide. However, its production continues to consume a significant amount of energy. The aim of this paper is to investigate and propose strategies for enhancing energy efficiency in formaldehyde production processes. Specifically, the study focuses on harnessing heat from the reactor's outlet stream to minimize the energy consumption associated with heat exchangers. By analyzing and optimizing the utilization of this heat source, the paper aims to contribute to sustainable manufacturing practices by reducing overall energy requirements and operational costs in formaldehyde production facilities. The process modification was simulated using Aspen HYSYS and the comparison of net-energy between the basic and the modified process is calculated using the net-energy formula. The results obtained that the Net-Energy (NE) value for both basic and modified process is 316,286,815.4 kJ/h and 125,757,792.9 kJ/h. This shows that the modified process has better energy efficiency compared to the basic process as the net-energy value zero. Therefore, this modification enhances the energy efficiency of the formaldehyde production process through methanol oxidation. Copyright © 2024 by Authors, Published by Universitas Diponegoro and BCREC Publishing Group. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0).

 

Keywords: Formaldehyde; Process modification; Energy efficiency; Net-energy

Article Metrics:

  1. Araya, S.S., Liso, V., Cui, X., Li, N., Zhu, J., Sahlin, S.L., Jensen, S.H., Nielsen, M.P., & Kær, S.K. (2020). A Review of The Methanol Economy: The Fuel Cell Route. Energies, 13(3), 596. DOI: 10.3390/en13030596
  2. Srivastava, R.K., Sarangi, P.K., Bhatia, L., Singh, A.K., & Shadangi, K.P. (2022). Conversion of methane to methanol: technologies and future challenges. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 12(5), 1851–1875. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01872-5
  3. Tabibian, S.S. & Sharifzadeh, M. (2023). Statistical and analytical investigation of methanol applications, production technologies, value-chain and economy with a special focus on renewable methanol. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 179, 113281. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113281
  4. Leso, V., Macrini, M.C., Russo, F., & Iavicoli, I. (2020). Formaldehyde exposure and epigenetic effects: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2319. DOI: 10.3390/app10072319
  5. Abdu, H., Kinfu, Y., & Agalu, A. (2014). Toxic effects of formaldehyde on the nervous system. International Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, 3(3), 050–059
  6. Malik, M.I., Abatzoglou, N., & Achouri, I.E. (2021). Methanol to formaldehyde: an overview of surface studies and performance of an iron molybdate catalyst. Catalysts, 11(8), 893. DOI: 10.3390/catal11080893
  7. Franz, A., Kronemayer, H., Pfeiffer, G., Pilz, R., Reuss, G., Disteldorf, W., Gamer, A., & Hilt, A. (2016). Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 17, 363–376. DOI: 10.1002/14356007.a11_619.pub2
  8. Mueller, J.U., Bruckner, T., & Triebig, G. (2013). Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 86, 107–117. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-012-0745-9
  9. Costa, S., & Teixeira, J.P. (2015). Formaldehyde: Human exposure, metabolism and potential health effects. Formaldehyde: Synthesis, Applications and Potential Health Effects, 1–29
  10. Shakeel, K., Javaid, M., Muazzam, Y., Naqvi, S.R., Taqvi, S.A.A., Uddin, F., Mehran, M.T., Sikander, U. & Niazi, M.B.K. (2020). Performance comparison of industrially produced formaldehyde using two different catalysts. Processes, 8(5), 571. DOI: 10.3390/pr8050571
  11. Dunky, M. Urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resins for wood. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 18(2), 95–107. DOI: 10.1016/S0143-7496(97)00054-7
  12. Dunky, M. Adhesives Based on Formaldehyde Condensation Resins. Macromolecular Symposia, 217(1), 417–430. DOI: 10.1002/masy.200451338
  13. Wang, J., Fang, K., Liu, X., Zhang, S., Qiao, X., & Liu, D. (2023). A review on the status of formaldehyde-free anti-wrinkle cross-linking agents for cotton fabrics: Mechanisms and applications. Industrial Crops and Products, 200, 116831. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116831
  14. Flueckiger, J., Ko, F.K., & Cheung, K.C. (2009). Microfabricated Formaldehyde Gas Sensors. Sensors, 9, 9196–9215. DOI: 10.3390/s91109196
  15. Mahdi, H.I., Ramlee, N.N., da Silva Santos, D.H., Giannakoudakis, D.A., de Oliveira, L.H., Selvasembian, R., Azelee, N.I.W., Bazargan, A. & Meili, L. (2023). Formaldehyde production using methanol and heterogeneous solid catalysts: A comprehensive review. Molecular Catalysis, 537, 112944. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2023.112944
  16. Taylor, S. (2017). Reflections on Catalytic Selective Oxidation: Opportunities and Challenges. Catalysts, 7(1), 34. DOI: 10.3390/catal7010034
  17. Kralj, A.K. (2010). Silver and oxide hybrids of catalysts during formaldehyde production. Energy, 35(6), 2528–2534. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.052
  18. Alqahtani, N.S., Alrefai, T.A., Almutlaq, A.M., Alzahrani, S.M., & Abasaeed, A.E. (2024). Energy Optimization through Heat and Power Integration on a Chlorobenzenes Production Plant. Processes, 12(3), 569
  19. Ko, D., Lee, M., Jang, W.H., & Krewer, U. (2008). Non-isothermal dynamic modelling and optimization of a direct methanol fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 180(1), 71–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.083
  20. Millar, G.J., & Collins, M. (2017). Industrial production of formaldehyde using polycrystalline silver catalyst. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(33), 9247–9265. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02388
  21. Javaid, A., Bildea, C.S. (2018). Coupling exothermic and endothermic reactions—Application to combined aniline production/ methyl-cyclohexane dehydrogenation. Asia Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 13(4), 1–12. DOI: 10.1002/apj.2210
  22. Yaws, C.L. (1999). Chemical Properties Handbook. Mc Graw Hill Handbooks. New York
  23. Bahmanpour, A. M., Hoadley, A., & Tanksale, A. (2014). Critical review and exergy analysis of formaldehyde production processes. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 30(6), 583–604. DOI: 10.1515/revce-2014-0022
  24. Silaipillayarputhur, K., & Khurshid, H. (2019). The design of shell and tube heat exchangers–A review. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 9(1), 87–102
  25. Rian, A.B., & Ertesvåg, I.S. (2011). Exergy analysis of a steam production and distribution system including alternatives to throttling and the single pressure steam production. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(1), 703–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.07.049
  26. Mujumdar, A.S. (1995). Superheated steam drying. Handbook of Industrial Drying, 2, 1071-1086
  27. Rosenow, J., & Eyre, N. (2022). Reinventing energy efficiency for net zero. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, 102602. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102602

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.